Like a spider dangled over the fire by a thread.
No I wasn’t emotionally scarred by high school American Lit, why do you ask?
Like a spider dangled over the fire by a thread.
No I wasn’t emotionally scarred by high school American Lit, why do you ask?
Also, he was suspended in July 2021, so the consequences were pretty quick, and only the final nail in the coffin was delayed.
Sisyphean Effort is actually a thing
omg Toad, you can’t just ask people why they’re purple!
Is this p-hacking?
“Journal”, “it’s”, and “because” are all mispelled in the original.
Nah, that’s another cut up with very little of the interview
Here is the full interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80DaR2CVNNk
If there was a government-mandated monopoly on coffee and it was sold in L/s, we probably would.
Surprised not to see any posts referencing the Arbitrary List of Popular Lights or !flashlight@lemmy.world.
One of the requirements to make it on the list is:
A user interface where a single click turns the light on in a reasonable mode, and another single click turns it off.
I absolutely understand the anger at the Democratic party. I mention several useful activities to work toward fixing its many failings. The Republican party is strictly worse. Giving equal support to both is counterproductive.
Yes, that is precisely what I was attempting to say. Thanks
The problem is there isn’t anything “useful” for understanding humans [in evolutionary psychology]. Yes we can come up with plausible evolutionary justifications for behavior like cooperation, but they are basically untestable and useless for predictions.
Edited to clarify I mean specifically evolutionary psychology.
This is an incorrect framing of the situation. You aren’t being asked for a Yes/No vote on Democrats. You are being asked if you prefer Democrats or Republicans. Or for this election, if you prefer Democracy or Fascism. If you vote “no preference”, that does not communicate “I prefer the Democrats, but want them to move further left”, either logically or politically.
There are lots of ways to communicate desired policy changes: letter-writing, primaries (including campaigning/funding for candidates), protests, marches, press, social-media, etc. Voting against your interest is not one of them.
The notion that housing should take up a particular portion of your income is fundamentally flawed. It relies on a fixed relationship between prices of different classes of goods, when that relationship varies over place and time.
Which situation is better: making 50k take-home and paying 15k in housing costs (30%), or making 100k and paying 50k (50%)?
There are real problems in the housing market and overall affordability, but this statistic is like trying to measure national health by the percentage of people drinking 8 glasses a day of water.
It’s a crude rule of thumb that was questionably useful when it was first promulgated, and now is entirely adrift from reality.
Perhaps not every disability benefit is, but Social Security Disability Insurance and State Disability Insurance certainly are.
I think the “correct” usage of acronym is only when it is spoken as a word. But language evolves and all that.
You can see the tension in the way MW defines it (including the extended description). Like: here’s the definition of the word, but some people use it when they actually mean initialism. This is in contrast to your more concise and cohesive definition of “[abbreviations] that take the first letter from each word”. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/acronym
Wyoming citizens count three times as much as California citizens