Alt. Profile @Th4tGuyII

  • 0 Posts
  • 601 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle

  • A currency as a “negotiable instrument” only works because:

    A. Everyone agrees that it does,

    B. Because the controller of the currency has value with which to back the currency

    B is less important these days with Fiat currency, but A is essential.

    Unless you’re a country’s central bank, nothing you make as a “negotiable instrument” is going to be recognised as such - and even if it was, if you’ve no valuabke resource with which to back it up, it’s worthless, so nobody would want it.

    I feel sorry for these people because I do get the sentiment behind it. They feel like they’re being screwed over and want a way to fight back - but if it were this easy, everybody would be doing it.




  • Exactly.

    People think they’re rich when they’ve won the lottery, and sure they are compared to the average person, but they’re just a fly on the wall in comparison to the ultra-wealthy.

    I simply don’t believe one can become that wealthy by any honest means - you can’t work to get that wealthy, you can’t win to become that wealthy, hell there are plenty of entire countries with less money than some of the ultra-wealthy.

    The fact that these people can play around with such an unimaginably absurd amount of wealth while so many more struggle, their wildest dreams but a fragment of a fragment of a fragment of what these people have, I find to be absurd.














  • Exactly. The big problem with LLMs is that they’re so good at mimicking understanding that people forget that they don’t actually have understanding of anything beyond language itself.

    The thing they excel at, and should be used for, is exactly what you say - a natural language interface between humans and software.

    Like in your example, an LLM doesn’t know what a cat is, but it knows what words describe a cat based on training data - and for a search engine, that’s all you need.