Elektromotoren nur bei 65%?
bin ich da dem hype aufgelaufen?
ich hatte die gesamte kette (Kraftwerk bis Rad) als besser als das im Kopf. Stromnetz mit 0.95, Batterie mit 0.9, umrichter mit 0.92, Motor eher 0.97 bin ich da so weit daneben?
yeah, but it’s not nearly as good as it seems.
ion thruster with a tiny bit of extra thrust snd ISP because of fusion reactions.
Looks like a partial clogged nozzle to me.
Just happened to happen at that height. If I’m right it should Start at the bottom on the next print as well.
Cold pull should be the solution.
It’s possible but is a lot more complicated with later switches.
First gen was super easy. I think current one needs a mod-chip installed to Boot custom Firmware (which you need for ROMs)
But they also showed with what they will come for you.
If you outsource decryption from emulation, they can’t do it (this way) again
I don’t think so.
But maybe Emulators need to change how they work.
Externalize a small, relatively simple tool to decrypt the ROM.
and a complicated, actively developed Emulator, that can only read decrypted ROMs.
With that, the Emulator shouldn’t be attackable the same way yuzu was.
Oh, I mean there’s nothing there.
A Court Document shows that Yuzu got a lawyer and will answer within 60 days of 2024-02-27.
The Answer will be the interesting bit. It may indicate if they wish to fight, or if they deem it not worth the effort.
Curious if this will fix my one issue I have with Finamp.
I have some quite large playlists I’d like to listen on shuffle. Finamp doesn’t do that well at all. (It seems it only shuffles what it has cached or something, as it seems to shuffle “only” the first 100 or so songs. of 3000+)
Yes, most people are not interesting. True for Emi/Imi-gration as well as dating. And in both cases it’s tough to hear.
You largely can choose the provider of this service, but they will also choose you (or not).
And you can not refrain from the service while being in the community of those that don’t refrain. In practice there are (nearly) no places where the community as a whole chooses to refrain.
If you’re in a country with compulsory military service, make yourself interesting for other countries and leave.
Doesn’t seem to be a flattering angle.
front view doesn’t seem as bad (but still wide).
Compared to the F35 from a bad angle.
But the twin-engine design on both sides of the pilot (unlike a J20) will probably just make for a wider body as well.
Did I miss the cost?
I think that 3d printing is not food safe because of the layers.
One can decide for themselves if they want to take that risk, but commercially selling medical stuff with those issues would not be my cup of tea.
/e oops, replied to the Not instead of OP.
so I’m hoping we’re finally getting close to a version that’s a little more robust.
Well, the Ondsel team which (claims to? I don’t know) work closely with FreeCAD hoped in October 23 to maybe get Topological Naming done by February 2024 (FOSDEM 2024 is 03rd and 4th of February
We think that these goals are within reach and it should be possible to release FreeCAD 1.0 in time for the next FOSDEM. Here’s our thinking behind this goal.
Since FreeCAD still seems to be in the beginning stages of phase 3, I doubt they’ll make that target.
Well, all of these companies intentionally try to lock the users into them, by making their files as unreadable as possible.
No Company wants to lose access to all of their models.
There are also still a lot of QoL issues with the GUI and no real attempt to bring in influences and widgets from direct modeling. FreeCAD is pure of heart and pure of thought, but I’m not sure I’m quite there, though I can at least imagine it now
fyi, there is now ondsel
based on FreeCAD, their release introduction reads:
So our thinking was: we should focus on a polished user experience and features that are essential to professional use. Let’s build something we feel good about recommending it to someone working on a deadline. And let’s build a service for vaulting and collaboration.
…
Our primary objective is to provide polish and sorely missing features — that’s a large part of the added value. We’ve made big and small changes in the upstream project, but the four vital projects for us have been toponaming, integrated assembly workbench, UX/UI, and collaboration.
So working exactly on what most consider FreeCADs weaknesses I’d say
Unfortunately toponaming is still not done for either. That will be a huge leap in usefulness for me.
(fixes models breaking when their topology changes)
Infill has massively diminishing returns. I don’t think 100% is required. Usually it’s much better to increase the number outer layers.
That said, depending on the cost scaling, the possibly positive effects of extra mass, and how much I want to avoid a second attempt, massive objects can make some sense.
PLA becomes brittle with moisture (from your hands and/or air). I would recomment PETG / ASA / ABS (ascending order).
Yes, basically all CAD and slicers (3d-printer software) can mirror. PrusaSlicer for example can mirror and then save to stl again.
Uhh that’s nice.
Even better if the same concept could work on Nintendo’s next gen coming up
It’s not necessary.
At best it’s because this way they don’t have to differentiate between networks, and make the system a bit easier for Bambi themselves.
At worst they want to lock you into an ecosystem they want to build and steal a ton of models people make.
eben, als gesamtkette immer noch besser, sagte ich doch