booty [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 48 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 11th, 2020

help-circle
    1. Democrats don’t want to win and don’t have any true beliefs, they’re controlled opposition

    2. No one cares what you “expose” about republicans anyway. People vote for who they’re told to vote for no matter what. They were told to vote for trump, they voted for trump, despite the fact that he’s a self-admitted sexual predator. They were told to vote for Biden so they voted for Biden, even though he is also a sexual predator, and a well-documented racist monster just like Trump of course.

    3. By consolidating behind Biden they kind of cut off their ability to criticize people for being like Biden. And Biden is basically a republican.







  • Point to where I said “we know they don’t let people in because they’re isolationist”.

    Sure! It was right here.

    The restrictions for leaving and entering have not been imposed on them externally, this attitude of Korea predates even the Roman empire

    Anyway, we’re at an impasse here. You’ve decided that the DPRK is not a distinct country and that all you need to know about their laws can be extrapolated from the ancient history of the Korean peninsula, and that anything modern which contradicts your juvenile interpretation of ancient history must simply be made up. I have no idea what species of brainworm is responsible for this ridiculous conspiracy theory, and I am not qualified to exterminate it.



  • You linked two things. One of these is an article about literal ancient history, and the other is an article about three Christians who all lived and died long before the country we’re discussing existed. Please, please explain to me how your “sources” are in any way relevant to the topic at hand.

    Your circular logic is as follows: The DPRK is isolationist. We know it’s isolationist because they don’t let people in. We know they don’t let people in because they’re isolationist. No, I won’t pay any attention to the hard fact that they do, in fact, let people in, and that it is in fact their enemies who do not let people into their country.






  • the room with people in red shirts has suddenly decided to connect with the rooms with the less numerous blue and green shirts
    think the red ones should simply return to their own room that they were perfectly happy with until now

    go back to reddit. this is the fediverse, the entire point is that these are not, in fact, “separate” rooms. being connected is the default. that’s why it requires a giant discussion to kick anyone out.

    Where exactly do you see the invitation?

    It was posted publicly to all federated communities and absolutely no indication was made that the majority of people to whom the post was sent were unwelcome to participate.

    On Hexbear, we have a rule that we have to leave meta discussions of other instances alone if they want us to. All the admin had to say was, “lem.ee users only” and we would’ve stayed out. If you refuse to take such a simple measure to restrict discussion to your own community, you do not actually want to restrict discussion to your own community.

    And the admin didn’t. You can go ask him. He was not trying to keep hexbear users out or in any way offended by the fact that we participated in the discussion. Why are you (a member of neither instance) offended on his behalf?


  • Imagine you’ve got 100,000 people in a room. Let’s say they’re split between people wearing blue shirts, green shirts, and red shirts. But it’s not an even split. Half of the people in the room are wearing red shirts. Someone in a blue shirt steps up onto the stage and says, “Open discussion everyone: I think red shirts are assholes and we should kick them all out of the room.”

    What exactly do you expect to happen next?

    Those instances need a space to discuss those goals among themselves, where the admins can communicate with the users, etc.

    That’s not what the thread in question was. We were invited to join the discussion. If we had not been welcome to join the discussion, we would have stayed out of it.


  • I say that, I’m going by every regular source that ever existed

    “regular source” citations-needed

    its near-impossible standards for leaving or entering

    did you know these are imposed on them externally? their policy is that they love tourists. here’s a video of a couple of australian tourists enjoying themselves there. the reason americans can’t go there is because the US forbids it.

    its lack of internet access (who here has seen anyone who is actually from North Korea),

    it’s a country under brutal siege for its entire history. yes, they’re poor. whose fault is that?