given it was first comment when i looked, it was Find Dumb Bro Shit On HN mode
the guy who got Elon and Grimes to hook up, destroying Twitter and then Reddit
given it was first comment when i looked, it was Find Dumb Bro Shit On HN mode
ah yeah, i blocked that guy a while ago lol
they’re already sniping at each other
GUYS GUYS THE LOGO IT IS VERY IMPORTANT
dunno if i have an unusual amount of blocked posters, but the ones i can see are fine? bsky is largely le home of le wokisme
found it: https://bsky.app/profile/gamingonlinux.com/post/3l5ca3blqgn2y
The idiots claimed using game engines was le wokisme and Godot took the piss, and Grummz ran with it
oh i dunno, there was
Honestly - Computer Science has given us more clues about how the human mind might work than cognitive science ever did.
You’re posting too much without reading, please come this way to the egress.
apparently godot posted something about supporting LGBT in games? can’t find the original. then Grummz posted ragebait about it and the chuds flooded their github and discord with fuckwittery
this is from like 5 min following links after reading your post
North Korea: “AUGH MY EYES”
amazing work they’ve achieved so far though
yes, that’s the complete change set for the fork
oh and a Godot discord moderator turned out to be extremely into dropping n-words in chat
The image gatcha does not create a new copyright. There might be a copyright in the text of a complex prompt (do you feel lucky in court?) Mere “sweat of the brow” does not generate a new copyright in the US, so e.g. retouching work on a photo does not generate a new copyright and photos of a public domain artwork do not create a new copyright.
This doesn’t touch on the old copyrights of the stuff Midjourney trained on to make its computer-mediated collages. Those copyrights still exist.
Does the computer-mediated collage launder the previous copyrights? The answer is “do you feel lucky in court?”
a user called “crypto-bitcoin” raises an issue with the World Wide Web Consortium’s Accessibility List
Journal of Awful Studies
actually i feel a bit bad about it now https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-01-27/daniella-cult-the-family-joined-the-army-toxic-control/101895164
apparently she is a real known person from military twitter
it’s always nice when a story just comes in on the twitter and nobody else has covered it yet
b-movie villain types sitting behind a desk
correct, academic publishing
it’s Friday so I probably won’t get an answer till Monday or Tuesday, but I did contact their press office asking about why the fuck NFTs in TYOOL twenty fucking twenty four and the sensitive issue of the art being facile plagiarism by an advertising executive
you sure about that?
The most depressing thing for me is the feeling that I simply cannot trust anything that has been written in the past 2 years or so and up until the day that I die. It’s not so much that I think people have used AI, but that I know they have with a high degree of certainty, and this certainty is converging to 100%, simply because there is no way it will not. If you write regularly and you’re not using AI, you simply cannot keep up with the competition. You’re out. And the growing consensus is “why shouldn’t you?”, there is no escape from that.
This is someone who literally can’t tell good writing from bad, so he assumes everyone is using AI
shocked that scorpions in a scorpion’s nest funded by their scorpion mates might have fallen into stinging
sign a toilet bowl