Das hilft bestimmt auch gegen polizeiliche Willkür /s

Herbert Reul muss endlich zurücktreten, wie kann man so inkompetent sein

I think you got me wrong here. The implication should he that repairability is good for the environment and a standardized form factor enables repairability. It’s not the best solution but still better than everything glued in, but you seem to not agree on that one either, do you?

I think so, but I think it’s a bad development. Rechargeable devices tend to be non-repairable and ultimately bad for the environment. A, AAA, etc are ultimately just standardized interfaces with standardized form factors and voltage, the actual batteries are available in both one-time-use and rechargeable variants. I think we should keep them around as they enable us to use our devices for a longer time without costly repairs or even disposal of the device itself. This does not apply to very complex and energy intensive devices like smart phones though, as they obviously require more sophisticated and space optimized batteries.

https://libreelec.tv/

💀

The MicroPython pyboard is a compact electronic circuit board that runs MicroPython on the bare metal, giving you a low-level Python operating system that can be used to control all kinds of electronic projects.

Literally the second paragraph

An Arroganz nicht zu überbieten 🤮

Also, Nextcloud/Owncloud are written in PHP, that might also have a significant impact on its poor reliability ^^

No, its the “Tesco Bootloader™”, duh 🙄

I’m pretty sure its in order for you to see more ads. If the article shows a read more button after a paragraph there’s more room for ads and you’re more likely to accidentally scroll down and view them.

!tja@feddit.org

Now what? Is that a crime or something? Fuck off man

Yeah I think generally it would make more sense for individual instances to focus on specific topics, like programming.dev on programming or feddit.org for Europe.

It still makes sense to have the same communities in different languages if you ask me. There may also be other instances where this might actually be good.

But yeah, I don’t need ten different tech communities all serving the same purpose.

Das will ich dir auch nicht unterstellen. Es ist aber auch nicht so, dass es für Linux nicht eine Trillion Zeilen Dokumentation geben würde (alleine über man bringt jedes Stück Software ja schon eine ausführliche Dokumentation über sich selbst mit, wenn es gut integriert ist). Geschweige denn von Ressourcen wie dem Arch-Wiki, Thomas-Krenn usw. Dass es für komplexere Probleme keine 1:1 Copy-Paste Lösung gibt, ist doch denke ich auch klar - die gibt es für Windows aber auch nicht. Der mutmaßliche Unterschied ist hier, dass der Hersteller deines Grafik-Tablets für Windows eben höchstwahrscheinlich fertige Konfigurationen bereitstellt. Natürlich alles frustrierend, aber es ist nicht die Schuld von Linux als Betriebssystem!

Umsteigerfreundlich nicht, aber umsteigerfreundlicher als vor einigen Jahren. Und besser als Windows allemal.

Wenn man einfach planlos irgendwelche Zeilen hin und her kopiert, dann sitzt das Problem allerdings vor dem Rechner und heißt nicht Linux ;-)

Linux ist ein grundlegend anderes Betriebssystem als Windows, natürlich gibt es da eine extrem steile Lernkurve.

Linux ist aber für den Anwender mindestens genau so intuitiv zu bedienen wie Windows. Die Administration übernimmt in Organisationen dann eine IT. Im privaten Umfeld muss ich mir die Erfahrung, die ich bei Windows über lange Jahre aufgebaut habe, aber natürlich erstmal aneignen - und das geht selbstverständlich nicht von heute auf morgen.

Sure! There’re actually a couple of things I like:

• It’s actually one of the few apps that still work like a traditional photo management app: It works on the base of a file-based library that has synchronization added on top. This enables me to freely move my library around, easily create backups of it or even reverse-engineer it. I’m aware there are brilliant foss apps like DigiKam (KDE/Linux) but they lack other aspects like synchronization and are not as tightly integrated.
• I’m still able to be somewhat independent on Apple: Since the library is file-based and I can extract my images using either my own tool or one of the tools available on GitHub, I can easily migrate away from apple should they start doing fishy things.
• Privacy-wise Apple seems to be one of the better options: Metadata like face recognition are computed locally on-device. I know there are more privacy oriented options like Ente, but their feature-set is not quite as mature as I need it.
• I just really like the apps: They’re well-integrated, easy to use and I like the editing capabilities. I also like the way they handle edited photos etc.

Organization-wise there’s nothing special. The only thing I do is to organize my images into albums.

To sum it up: It’s highly subjective but for my workflow it’s a good mix of autonomy and still good user experience.

I use a self-written tool to extract my images and videos from Apple Photos and back them up incrementally as files and directories using Borg Backup.

Using this approach I retain full ownership over my data without having to look for alternatives to Apple Photos, which I really enjoy using.

As a result, I have a “live” copy on my iPhone/Mac/iCloud, a backup on my NAS and a remote Borg Backup repository in a data center.

Und setzen sich dafür ein, dass ihre Arbeitnehmer mehr Leistungswasser trinken ^^