I definitely agree that these types of blocking are ineffective and generally do more harm than good, but if governments are going to push for this stuff, it would be good to have a solution that doesn’t harm people’s security and privacy.
Boring enough to use #Debian, fun enough to use #Arch • #Hardware & #Software Development • #RapidPrototyping • #EmbeddedSystems — he/him
I don’t post exclusively about one topic. Expect random stuff on #coding, #retrocomputers, #DIYsolar, or things I’m passionate about like #livablecities, #a11y.
I love to chat about my own interests, but also boost/share things that are new to me that I find interesting. #art, #literature, #food, and whatever else, I’m excited to explore it all!
I definitely agree that these types of blocking are ineffective and generally do more harm than good, but if governments are going to push for this stuff, it would be good to have a solution that doesn’t harm people’s security and privacy.
It’s the US republicans who want to do this, not me, I’m just approaching this as an interesting problem.
As for my suggested solution, the only database would be the list of sites with adult content. No new personal data would be stored about individuals.
I’m not suggesting that ISPs implement photo-ID checks, just a login with your ISP username/password (an account you already have).
@PriorProject @PorkrollPosadist
All the examples you provided were infrastructure, not social communities, so I think it’s a poor comparison.
Instead, I’d compare AP federation to _social_ constructs. Communities, clubs, groups of friends. Even larger constructs like cities or nation states.
In _those_ examples it’s clear that limiting association is commonplace and healthy.