Not everything is about you, Russia. Do they really define WWII by someone attacking them? That’s ignoring a lot.
Not everything is about you, Russia. Do they really define WWII by someone attacking them? That’s ignoring a lot.
From the article:
Another question I considered was whether to pass women talking about a man in a work-related (as opposed to romantic) context. There were times when it seemed like it would make sense with the spirit of the test—like passing Dr. Crusher and Nurse Ogawa talking about a collapsed male patient’s medical condition—but it seemed to open the door too much. Ideally, an episode would have more than one scene of women talking, so it wouldn’t be the determining factor.
Part of why the Bechdel Test is so useful is that it’s such a low standard that it’s surprising that so many things fail, and it’s hard to argue there’s not room for improvement.
How do you think I feel, I felt old when these posts were about walkmans.
¿Por qué no los dos?
Niko! It’s Roman, lets go bowling!
You are not. First thing I thought.
I like it, I like how they’re trickling in TOS (2nd pilot) characters and filling in the blanks between the two TOS pilots.
Switched to Mastodon end of last year.
Would be great if we succeed, tourism is only a relatively small part of the economy here.
21st century doctor: it’s probably stress, take two advil.
I’ve seen one around some places, don’t remember where though.
So, what if you and your victim are not on a ship?
Brenter?