They gave a link.
So it’s not a flaw.
But, he is, right? Is there some nuance in the definition of “dictator” I missing that gives him some wiggle room? Or is this more like obvious racists and pedophiles being offended at being called racists and pedophiles?
Reading through the comments in this thread, I’d just like to mention how amusing it is to see so many people in the fediverse arguing in favor of walled gardens and vendor lock-in. Like, do you even know where you are?
While working for a company about 15 years that made web based educational software, we had a potential client try pitching us on a website he wanted us to build.
He had lots of vague hand wavy ideas, but he had two very concrete ideas that the site absolutely needed. A) It had to be, “in the cloud”, and B) it must be, "Web 2.0”.
Spoiler alert. The mammals won (for now)