@Jin008

I asked for reliable sources about China, and all you get is a propaganda site and two YT links. Honestly?

@pancake

The best thing you can do for yourself is to avoid the communities where you get such stuff.

@pancake

I mean, how could those restrictive laws have passed in the first place if most people in the region were against them?

As someone already said, the answer is obvious but you may have (intentionally?) ignored a simple fact. The Chinese government pursues a dictatorial policy, it doesn’t matter “if most people in the region were against them” as people have no say.

@Geobloke@lemm.ee

So what is a reliable source for China?

Only anecdotes from questionable sources

What is a good source about China?

?

The unions in China are not much more than a mouthpiece of the CCP. They have nothing to say.

Deepseek is welcome in Europe as all others, as long as it complies with EU’s GDPR and the law: A quick reminder that Deepseek is being probed so far in Italy (where it’s prohibited), in France, and Ireland. We’ll see whether other countries follow.

There should be a solution to this once they both agree on mutual independence.

with claim to all China’s territory.

What does that mean? Taiwan doesn’t claim ‘all of China’s territory’ …

Yes, the Vatican is also silent on China’s supression of religious groups, including catholics.

‘There is no longer a safe place to be a Christian in China’ - report

The Chinese government is increasingly cracking down on state-sanctioned churches as well as underground churches, leaving no “safe place” for Christians, according to International Christian Concern.

A new report by ICC tracks persecution of Christians in China since July 2021 and records 32 cases of arrests and detainments, five raids on Christian schools, and 20 cases of the Sinicization of churches - where churches are forced to align their faith with the social and political messaging of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

The ICC said that exact numbers were likely to be far higher because of the challenges of receiving information from China.

@jet@hackertacks.com

I personally believe this is some sort of political rhetoric. Marcos knows well that China won’t stop its aggression.

@NutinButNet

@Scheisser

There’s a related report focusing on the Serbian prime minister’s resignation:

Serbia’s PM Milos Vucevic resigns amid Chinese contractor controversy – [unpaywalled link]

Vucevic was mayor of Novi Sad before becoming prime minister in elections last April. His successor as mayor also resigned on Tuesday. Protesters claim the Chinese consortium responsible for renovating parts of Novi Sad station had bypassed safety regulations with the ­assistance of corrupt officials.

…

There is a growing perception that the president [Vucic, who is now about to decide whether to form a majority government or hold a snap parliamentary election] is trying to quash democratic freedoms in Serbia and turn the country back towards Moscow, despite ­Belgrade’s formal efforts to join the European Union. Serbia is a candidate to join the bloc but must first normalise relations with its neighbour Kosovo, which broke away from Serbia after a Nato intervention in 1999 that brought an end to Slobodan Milosevic’s brutal crackdown on ethnic Albanian separatists.

Removed by mod

‘So what?’: Privacy warnings about DeepSeek fall on deaf ears

Privacy activists are warning about the invasive nature of DeepSeek, which collects a trove of personal user information that could be handed over to the Chinese government

People, however, just don’t care.

Luke de Pulford, co-founder of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC), shared screenshots from the Chinese AI chatbot’s privacy policy, which stated data it collects is stored in “secure servers located in the People’s Republic of China.”

…

“Just fyi, @deepseek_ai collects your IP, keystroke patterns, device info, etc etc, and stores it in China, where all that data is vulnerable to arbitrary requisition from the [Chinese] State,” said de Pulford, leader of IPAC, a global group of lawmakers who seek to hold China accountable for democratic abuses.

“Anticipating tedious whataboutery: the difference between this and free-world social media apps is that you can enforce your data rights in rule of law countries. This is not the case in China,” said de Pulford. >

Clearly, however, there are concerns about censorship, democracy and security. One of the drivers of the Chinese AI industry has been access to extraordinary amounts of data, which is more difficult to get hold of in the West.

This is a very brief paragraph about real issues. The whole article basically says that “China is better because it’s cheaper,” but it doesn’t say exactly why it’s cheaper. You’ll find a lot of reliable information about slavery-like labour in China and the absence of any workers’ rights. This BBC article ignores that completely.