I interpret Larissa Waters’ tweet as you did and am shocked by it. That you seem to consider it reasonable is disturbing.

While it is unfortunate that women without rape evidence cannot get justice, there are just as many evil women in the world as there are evil men. If they automatically get believed without evidence in rape allegations (or predator/stalker allegations like my friend’s case) then of course the evil ones will exploit that to put in jail the men they simply don’t like.

I have it on good authority that she has me next in her sights because I am co-admin of what she sees as a rival activist group. This is the right-wing hijacking well intentioned but naive left-wing sentiment.

The AVO matters because the court tacked on a new condition a few months later in a hearing he wasn’t even invited to: He was not to mention her publicly even indirectly (eg “one of the people running group X”).

Identifying her in the video isn’t resulting just in her seeking civil defamation against him but also pushing for criminal contempt of court (despite due process being ignored by the court).

Meanwhile she was allowed to continue defaming him. In fact him suing her for defamation is how it all started: she posted publicly that he is a sexual predator and stalker. So there are two opposing defamation cases in the pipeline and thw one criminal case against my friend.

The successful AVO was intended by her to demonstrate to her thousands of followers that her accusations were valid, even though she had no relevant evidence for the rubber stamp AVO. The add-on was to gag him so that he could not deny the allegations she was publicly making against him.

Thanks.

Thanks. Google Analytics doesn’t work that way though does it?

Really? You expected Trump to base his speech on facts?

That should have been expected from Trump. Biden should have memorized statistics to counter the predictable bullshit.

Not that memorizing stuff is important for the job but it would have been effective in the debate for viewers who just won’t fact check anything.

there was so much jumping around and avoiding questions that it was not very helpful.

Trump did this, but where did Biden do it?

they can in turn use it as a point when luring advertisers.

Wouldn’t that be shared only with potential advertisers upon request via a password rather than just making it publicly available?

I am only speculating, are you?

RadioLab covered the dawning of the (serendipitous) discovery a few years ago called: “bringing back gamma”.

That does not answer my question.

No I don’t trust their methodology. In fact I am suspicious the numbers are entirely fictitious. I imagine they are highly guarded confidential information which is not public.

I meant $100k (not $100). I doubt he will get costs even if he wins. She also got an AVO out against him based on this. Claims it has ruined her business (she wants $100k for lost revenue despite not showing tax returns) and that she fears for her life complete with waterworks in the hearing (despite him living interstate).

The current political climate is biased in her favour. After the Higgins trial win Larissa Waters tweeted “I believe women”.

He subpoenaed mug shots of the women arrested at the rally but none are of her. Seems the police are in on it, using her as a honeypot to attract the extremists. Courts protect police.

And where does he get the traffic data from?

The websites would be guarding that and Google Analytics (if installed/enabled) would not divulge it to a third party.

deleted by creator

Nikki Haley voting for Trump after he called her a birdbrain proves his point.

#Robodebt will have at least created a generation of citizens who understand the level of government corruption. It was an actual conspiracy.

My favorite Chaser is from their TV show when they dressed as Bin Laden and bypassed security to get near George Bush.

Point taken. I did look it up because I expected half of it to be true.

In Australia we have two satire sites called Betoota Advocate and The Chaser which sometimes are about 80% factual (about conservatives).

This is just an Onion type satire site. He didn’t mention any house-maid. Citing missing out on Sky TV as “hardship” though is still bizarre.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/jun/12/rishi-sunak-went-without-lots-of-things-including-sky-tv-as-a-child

deleted by creator

They sing in a higher pitch (more annoying to humans?) to compensate for urban noise.

Selfish people don’t care about those factors. The existing graph has a better chance of swaying them.