In my comment elsewhere, I suggested that he wiped his phone before ever being approached. You can’t have committed a crime here if you did not know you were under investigation. It’s not destruction of evidence if there is no investigation.

A lot of people will wipe their phone when getting off the plane so that there is nothing searchable on it. When they get home, they then add it back to their account and move on with life.

Article doesn’t go into it, but what likely happened was that he has everything cloud-synced on his phone and did just that. They decided that they wanted his data but he’d wiped it before they approached him. This arrest and charge is all about them being sad that they couldn’t properly harass him, so they are harassing him in a different way. It will go absolutely nowhere.

I fully agree. Completely inappropriate but not surprising for someone who surely had little emotional development because of the family business.

These were never substantiated. In fact some children came forward and said that their parents coached them to say these things.

Two takes:

1. It’s possible that summering happened but could not be proven.
2. It’s possible that nothing happened at all.

The circumstances point more to the latter. I personally believe that a bunch of greedy bastards were after money and had no problem destroying someone’s life in the process.

It’s not personal. How many idiots have lied, been ignorant, or didn’t think it was important and caused a lot of trouble in the process?

Ex: in free clinics that specialize in sexually active gay men, they don’t ask if you take street drugs, they ask if you’ve ever taken Viagra without a prescription. Stimulants cause impotence.

This was a very good opinion piece.

She’s a good case study for how conservatism is fueled by a lack of empathy.

I’ve always had trouble getting to the end. It requires great concentration and a partner who is willing to be still. It took me four years from the first time I had sex until I was able to cum.

You mean to say that some people who write history are biased. History itself does not hold agency.

That’s sort of what I had in mind.

History isn’t a living thing, it’s a concept. People within history may be biased, however.

You’d have a lot of people erasing their trauma and then not understanding why they do or feel a certain way about things.

There’s an entire field of study called “History” and people are trained to do just that. YOU, specifically, want otherwise. Don’t project that on other people.

Bonus points if they open Spotlight and type “CMD”.

So does that mean that this was really a Millenial problem? Cuz I don’t think that you heard about this before the early 2000s, maybe the late 90s.

All things that suck and are part of human nature. Sadly most people seem unable to grow past their primal urges.

Where did you gather that I’m ok with that? What a strange comment. One can view history through a neutral lens.

Honestly, though, this has happened throughout all of human civilization. It’s only now that people think it’s generally a bad thing. In the past, you either didn’t care, suffered it, or celebrated the conquest.

Actually it’s one of the more stable things out there. It resists economic issues.

Some governments will buy up large amounts but I bet a huge portion of it is privately acquired.