Rufo described Jonatan Pallesen as “a Danish data scientist who has raised new questions about Claudine Gay’s use – and potential misuse – of data in her PhD thesis” in an interview published in his newsletter and on the Manhattan Institute’s City Journal website last Friday.

He did not tell readers that a paper featuring Pallesen’s own statistical work in collaboration with the eugenicist researchers has been subject to scathing expert criticism for its faulty methods, and characterized as white nationalism by another academic critic.

The revelations once again raise questions about the willingness of Rufo – a major ally of Ron DeSantis and powerful culture warrior in Republican politics – to cultivate extremists in the course of his political crusades.

The Guardian emailed Rufo to ask about his repeated platforming of extremists, and asked both Rufo and the Manhattan Institute’s communications office whether they had vetted Pallesen before publishing the interview. Neither responded.

  • cmbabul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Motherfucking eugenics is making a comeback, Jesus they’ll be citing phrenologists next

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        A fair point, I’m autistic and have definitely had questions about kids, I’m not having them for different reasons but I guess I didn’t realize that IS eugenics in the moment. Nobody’s been feeling my skull though

        • DarkGamer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Voluntarily eliminating heritable genetic diseases is also eugenics, unfortunately many people inappropriately associate the term exclusively with the atrocity of forced eugenics/genocide.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Well no, eugenics is the bad stuff, when you decide whether or not to have kids based on the likelihood for them to inherit traits for you you’d rather not pass along, that’s just family planning

          • thereticent@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            You are technically correct, but the practical thing to do is abandon the term when it’s not forced/tragic. No reason to rehabilitate the term.

            And a fun but important fact is that genetic and heritable diseases are not necessarily the same. I went too long as a clinician conflating the two: https://www.veritasint.com/blog/en/difference-between-genetic-and-hereditary-diseases/ (corporate link but correct and well written)

            • rusticus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              Not understanding simple genetics is embarrassing. Don’t know what your training and degree are but that is unacceptable.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Who decides what a disease is and how do you ensure that they don’t make a mistake and the program is 100% voluntary with zero coercion ever?

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I am very sorry. If it helps any at all you should know that the majority of people are wise enough to know that an attack on one of us is an attack on all of us. If we can cleanse people based on a disability we can cleanse people based on anything really. Maybe bald people are not fit to live, maybe ugly people, maybe short people, maybe brown, maybe woman with small boobs. Once humans are not the measure of all values, once science is replaced with bullshit like IQ, the values of the world are whatever the powers-that-be declare to be icky.

        You have value, your value is the same as mine, your value is the same as everyone else. Fuck Nazis, fuck IQism, and fuck anyone who tries to make you or anyone else disabled feel like crap for the crime of existing.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sure why not? For some reason Google news wants to tell me my horoscope every day, I know ani-vaxxers, I know people who swear by chiropractors and reki healing, I know gluten avoiders. Should we even discuss what happened to all the TV networks that used to run educational programs?

      Maybe fuck it, maybe we are all heading back into the dark ages.

        • bufordt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sure, but when someone tells a server that they absolutely can’t have gluten, but then says that the fries cooked in the same oil as the breaded chicken fingers will be fine, they probably don’t have celiac disease.