• sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Is it humane to spend those resources on a prisoner instead of redirecting the funds to a social program? We’ve already decided we’re going to remove these people from society. The Internet says it costs about $100 a day to house a minimum security prisoner, or around $3k a month. That could feed 20 people for a month.

    • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s a lot more humane than killing them and later finding evidence that the conviction was a mistake. Unless you know a necromancer, keeping the most heinous offenders in prison for life is the most we can do.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m against capital punishment but you’re way off track here, missing the forest for the trees lol

        you act like every case could go either way at any time. There are many where their crimes are unquestionable. In that case, is nitrogen more humane than keeping them locked in a box until they die? Sucking up funds that could help actual innocent people in need? That is the point being made here

        • prole@sh.itjust.worksBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Once again: it is cheaper to house a prisoner for life than to execute one.

    • prole@sh.itjust.worksBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s cheaper to house a prisoner for life than to execute one.