• PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Personally I think it should be a definition instead of a straight number

        Something like the current LD50 of old age or something.

        • ditty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          We could tie it to average American life expectancy and that’d incentivize Congress to improve healthcare in this country

        • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          How about we just have them take the ACT or hell even a GED test to qualify to be in the running?

          I swear it’s easier to become president than it is to get into college.

          • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Funniest version of this I’ve heard of is having to pass the citizenship test every time you want to run

            • 3ntranced@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Tbh as a man in his mid 20s, born and raised in the USA, and passed high-school constitution test; I don’t think I could pass the citizenship test.

              It’s over complicated by design.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          What is the minimum age to be eligible to the function?

          What is the life expectancy for the candidate’s gender?

          Life expectancy - minimum age of eligibility = max age of eligibility

          • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            5 days ago

            Right now that would restrict eligibility to be president down to between the ages of 35 and 41

            I’m no fan of gerontocracy but I’m pretty sure almost nobody who’s served as president would have been eligible under those restrictions.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Well looks like they either have to work on increasing life expectancy for everyone or lower the minimum age or presidents will become very young, right? Either way, people win.

              By the way, that’s max 40 for men and 45 for women, so women presidents at last!

              Bring in the downvotes, my solution is the equivalent of what they’re doing to young people right now yet I haven’t seen anyone complain about it!