• randint@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How can Americans possibly be Americans if they don’t speak American?

            • diablexical@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              If your views can only be propagated through violence, don’t you think they should be reconsidered?

              • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                26
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                If your views can only be propagated through violence, don’t you think they should be reconsidered?

                Please share this pearl of wisdom with the US government, if you’re successful you’ll literally save millions of lives and no one on the planet will ever be more deserving of the Nobel prize. Please also share this sentiment with the soldiers in question, they’re literally involved in killing hundreds of thousands when it’s not millions to supposedly propagate American views on freedom and democracy (but in reality installing puppet governments for geopolitical power or to facilitate the theft of natural resources).

              • robinn2 [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                22
                ·
                1 year ago

                I would love for a nonviolent approach to a different path. The PCI tried that in Indonesia and the US backed a massacre of over a million people and secretly bombed Indonesian territory under the pretext of popular discontent (see The Jakarta Method); Allende tried that in Chile, and the US backed a bloody coup, replacing him with the dictator Pinochet; this was tried in Afghanistan, in return for which the US backed terrorism with the express purpose of undermining reform, and with the result of worsening women’s and underprivileged rights and eventually returning to bomb the country and kill hundreds of thousands; Sankara was killed in. US-backed coup, so on and so forth, read Frantz Fanon “On Violence.” Instead of this critique being leveled at the US and their military apparatus, it is slyly redirected, and then the claim is put forward that the revolutionary only understands violence, can only operate through it. We see no peaceful road to liberating the third world from imperialism, not because this is what we wish but because any attempt is met with terror and bombs. I am not afraid to say that as a consolation the rabble will get on top by other means. Fuck America.

                • diablexical@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So crimes of our fathers then, Americans deserve to die. Pardon me, I don’t find this discussion constructive. May your keyboard warrior spirit never falter, good luck.

                  • Farman [any]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    19
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You are still invading several countries rigth now. And messing with many others in lots of ways. That crimes of our fathers deffence only works if you stop doing it.

                  • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Bruh they’re still doing it. Love how you pearl clutch and pretend they said Americans should die and not the volunteer soldiers currently killing to maintain this order.

          • randint@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I agree with your sentiment, but we should refrain from using these emotionally charged words. We must remain polite so that people reading this thread will get a bad impression of Hexbear.

            • randint@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m pretty sure they would rather use Taiwan as their name in Olympics if China allowed them to.

            • diablexical@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Haha you got me there! Guess that settles it.

              Question - do you know if they include Taiwan’s gold medal count with mainland China’s?

        • randint@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Chinese Taipei is not a place name. It is the name people in Taiwan use to participate in sports. Like it or not, the island is called Taiwan, whether they are their own nation or just a province of China.

            • randint@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I can accept you claiming that Taipei is a city in China, but the Wikipedia article you link to does not seem to agree.

              • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                But it does? I mean it’s a long article, I’m not going to read the whole thing for something this uncontroversial, but I’ll back up my very factual assertion with evidence from the opening paragraph.

                Taipei (/ˌtaɪˈpeɪ/),[4]

                This implies Taipei exists, thus backing up my assertion that “Taipei is” and “is”.

                officially Taipei City,[I]

                Since it’s named Taipei city, this is circumstantial proof that Taipei is a city.

                is the capital[a]

                Capitals are cities, this backs my assertion that Taipei is a city.

                and a special municipality of Taiwan.[7][8]

                Taiwan is a location in China, this backs my assertion that Taipei is a city associated with China if you combine it with the rest of the sentence. Technically it could still be somewhere else.

                Located in Northern Taiwan,

                This means that Taipei is on Taiwan, so now the information presented has changed from being associated with to being inside of.

                Taipei City is an enclave of the municipality of New Taipei City that sits about 25 km (16 mi) southwest of the northern port city of Keelung.

                This provides specificity in case there are multiple places named Taiwan, since we now also know it’s close to Keelung which is also in China.

                Most of the city rests on the Taipei Basin, an ancient lakebed. The basin is bounded by the relatively narrow valleys of the Keelung and Xindian rivers, which join to form the Tamsui River along the city’s western border.[9]

                This doesn’t provide additional information for my purposes, but they reiterate that it’s a city and in proximity to locations in China.

                • randint@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Taipei is the capital and a special municipality of Taiwan.[7][8]

                  Notice the preposition of. They did not say in. If they used in that could mean that they think Taipei is in China. But they used of, implying that Taiwan is a country. They also used the word capital, meaning a city where the political center of a country is, not as in a “city”. There is (generally) only one capital in each country. Also, the text did not at all say that Taipei is in China. That Taipei is in China is what you (incorrectly) inferred from the text.

                  • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ah but Taiwan is a special municipality and has it’s own government. So this is expected actually. China is actually in a weird situation where there is a rebel government that controls a portion of the country, and they claim their capital is Nanjing. But because the regular government controls Nanjing they have a temporarily administrative centre in Taipei, since it’s the only large city under rebel control. So Taipei is just a capital in China, specifically the capital of Taiwan municipality, but isn’t the capital of China. China actually has many capitals. Hohhot, Lhasa, Nanning, Ürümqi, Taipei, Yinchuan and Beijing. (According to the rebels, it’s only Nanjing).

                    This is kinda besides the point of whether Taipei is a place or not though. You’re right, it didn’t say it’s in China. You need to click on the article for Taiwan or read further down for that. That’s why I mentioned that it has multiple place-names, so you could look those up on a map. They really should’ve mentioned where the city is, I think that’s pretty standard for an encyclopedia article on a city.