Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoScience factlemmy.worldimagemessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down122
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageScience factlemmy.worldFlying Squid@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squarezitrone 🍋@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 month agoIt seems to be the agreed definition in Astrophysics, that in order for a stellar object to be called “Star” it has to have nuclear fusion. While a redefiniton would be possible, there is no need and it would just cause confusion.
minus-squareAnIndefiniteArticle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoIt absolutely depends on the context.
It seems to be the agreed definition in Astrophysics, that in order for a stellar object to be called “Star” it has to have nuclear fusion. While a redefiniton would be possible, there is no need and it would just cause confusion.
It absolutely depends on the context.