• Albbi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      To me it’s unethical to let someone suffer until they finally pass.

      • yannic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That’s a false dichotomy.

        The principle of double effect allows one to attempt to relieve suffering with treatments having high mortality rates.

        Euthanasia is a cost-saving measure to avoid the high costs of palliative care for non-palliative patients, and in the examples cited in the article – healthcare in general.

        • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          As a disabled person who does not make enough money to exist, this is how I see it for social programs as well. Keep the sick and injured in a constant state of anxiety and neediness until they finally break and ask for maid. It’s easier to get maid than it is to be respected as a human being.

          That being said, also as a sick/ disabled person I am glad maid does exist.