Tweet by Margaret Atwood and a mansplainer's reply

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve never read the book. But it’s wild how devout Christians never see Christian radicalism as the problem. Literally anything can be radicalized.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      IHMO, if you just look at it like any other form of Tribalism (i.e. Political, National and even Sports) it absolutelly makes sense that people whose identity is a Religion (or a Political Party, Nation or even Sports club) cannot emotionally accept that those of “their tribe” are bad since one of the core foundations of Tribalism is exactly that “we” are good and it’s the “others” that are bad.

      The massive and for them extremelly important mental and emotional construct of self-validation and self-aggrandizing such people have based on their identity as member of a tribe (all those “we members-of-tribe are something-good” beliefs) - often at the cost of personal achievement recognition or as compensation for lack of personal achievement - would collapse if they accepted that the basic axiom of “membership of the tribe makes/proves people good/superior” is not true, so at the most basic psychological level they’re driven to not question that axiom and to deny anything that might disprove it.

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re right about how they view their “tribe”. I think it’s interesting how tribalism unfolds though. At times you have ostracization (RINO, sects, gatekeeping). But sometimes it’s staunch defense. You could see this in real time after January 6th when people couldn’t decide if the insurrectionists were ANTIFA or patriots. It’s just interesting when it goes one way or the other. Hell, in 2016 Trump went from the crazy guy in the room to the core of the party.