Summary

Oregon Democrat Janelle Bynum won a seat in the U.S. House, becoming the state’s first Black representative after defeating Republican incumbent Lori Chavez-DeRemer in a closely watched race for Oregon’s 5th Congressional District.

Bynum led by a strong margin in key counties, ensuring a Democratic victory. Her campaign emphasized combatting extremism, reproductive rights, and economic growth, and she received significant support and funding from national Democrats.

While Republicans retain a narrow lead in the overall House, Bynum’s win represents a major gain for Oregon Democrats amid a competitive election cycle.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Right, but every seat Democrats manage to siphon away is one less vote in support of fascism. And House Republicans do a lot of internal fighting. I will laugh out loud if they can’t pick a speaker again, and it somehow affects the timeline for counting the EC votes.

      • Myxomatosis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The future will be miserable but I will at least be able to find joy in their failures. The backstabbing and incompetence in the Trump admin will be legendary.

        • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Trump was already a paranoid nutcase who fostered an atmosphere of chaos and betrayal the last time he was in office. Given the way his declining mental state has been making him even more hostile and unstable, I can’t imagine how bad it’s going to get this time around.

          • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            21 hours ago

            My boss said that if they don’t get anything done in the first 2 years, it’s not likely to happen in the next few. And they’ve been involved with the government since Carter.

            I hope y’all are right.

            • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Doesn’t really matter if the entire Republican Party is behind his ideals (Peter Theil’s cock with a side of project 2025) We have no voice.

      • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I don’t know the answer to this and am too drunk to research right now but. I really wonder how many of the people causing ire beforehand are still even left in congress now. I’m worried a lot of the loud voices were replaced with trumpie fucking losers. But again. Just assumption based on my end.

      • andyortlieb@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        The dynamics of the game are way different with a Republican Senate and president. I bet they’ll fall in line in a heartbeat if they keep the house.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        24 hours ago

        That would be intentional. They’d have to screw with the timeline for counting the EC votes if Trump kicks it between December 17th and January 6th. Otherwise, the House would be obligated to create a Harris/Vance administration.

        • morriscox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Having the President and the Vice-president be of different parties used to be a thing until a law passed banning that.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            19 hours ago

            There’s no law “banning” that. You’re talking about the 12th amendment revising the electoral process so that the VP is elected in a separate EC election, rather than being the runner up in the presidential election.

            That same 12th amendment requires, when a presidential candidate does not have 270 votes, to select the president from the top three candidates based on number of EC votes. If Trump strokes out after they cast their votes on December 17th, no candidate will have received 270 votes. When they go to count the votes on January 6th, the only valid EC votes cast for president will have been cast for Harris, so we get a Harris/Vance ticket.

            The Republicans could spend one vote on Vance for President, allowing the House to vote for him. But then a similar situation happens in the Senate with Walz, and the Senate only gets to choose between the top two VP candidates based on EC votes. We could theoretically end up with a Vance/Walz administration.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Exactly. People forget they not all the republicans are MAGAs. The GOP equivalent of Joe Manchin exists, and they’re going to have a lot of power with a slim majority.

    • Furball@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep, control runs through California, which is taking its sweet time counting the votes. It will be days before we know who controls the house, although it’s going to be the republicans more likely than not

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        23 hours ago

        California’s “sweet time” includes allowing votes postmarked on Election Day to arrive and be counted. You might not be happy waiting but I’m glad to live in a state that values every vote and makes voting as accessible as possible. I won’t say “easy” because our ballot was 6 pages long, but it was easy to read and mark at home, and mail or put in a box or hand to a person.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Irresponsible to say “taking it’s sweet time…” these days without also mentioning explicitly that this is the specific effect of decades of a GOP cause to sabotage how votes are collected, processed, tallied and reported.

        • Furball@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          What did the GOP have to do with the vote counting in California? I appreciate California for counting every vote but I’m not sure what republicans had to do with making it slow

    • flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      AP still hasn’t called her. And they have 212 RNC and 200 DNC. So if it’s 201, then republican need 6 to claim majority now.