

Liberalism is defined by advocates of guaranteed human rights and freedoms so long as those freedoms don’t infringe upon others’.
So, no, actually. None of the stuff you said.
Liberalism is defined by advocates of guaranteed human rights and freedoms so long as those freedoms don’t infringe upon others’.
So, no, actually. None of the stuff you said.
Feels like grasping at straws, here. Sure, NYT aren’t his biggest fans, but the article has this as evidence of its’ claims:
“opinions on Israel are changing fast”, and cautioned that “Mamdani’s victory is not a fluke. It’s a sign of things to come.”
He is, of course, right.
Clearly The MiddleEastEye agrees with NYT about Mamandi, so let me flip that; why is MEE so afraid of Zohran Mamdani?
The “IF” is doing some heavy lifting with the weighing of options.
Michael Dunne is actually someone who worked in Chinese Automotive manufacturing. He’s the Chinese car manufacturer saying “Chinese cars are good and cheap.”
His word is basically meaningless.
Former big corporation*
Who also worked primarily in Chinese Automotive industry*
Michael Dunne has been competing the entire time, for the Chinese. His statements here aren’t fear, they’re shillery.
Free markets were always a terrible idea, the USA economic system was basically founded on principles of regulation of goods like tea, tobacco, and alcohol.
Uh, to be clear, I don’t think Michael Dunne is advocating against China in this context. He worked in the Chinese auto sector for decades. He isn’t an alarmist, he’s their salesman.
Lmao, Chinese shills are actual news now? Fucking low as it gets.
I hope they put this line in the history books when they cover 21st century climate change.
I’m conflicted about this because on one hand people deserve to know the truth from a primary source.
On the other hand, wouldn’t it be easier to interview the people who delivered Hitler’s lunch than it would be to buy Hitler lunch a couple of times a month?
A pie is more than three alphanumerical characters to you. You can eat pie, things like nutrition, digestion, taste, smell, imagery all come to mind for you.
When you hear a prompt and formulate a sentence about pie you don’t compile a list of all words and generate possible outcomes ranked by statistical approximation to other similar responses.
Yeah no shit, AI doesn’t think. Context doesn’t exist for it. It doesn’t even understand the meanings of individual words at all, none of them.
Each word or phrase is a numerical token in an order that approximates sample data. Everything is a statistic to AI, it does nothing but sort meaningless interchangeable tokens.
People cannot “converse” with AI and should immediately stop trying.
I haven’t trusted Mozilla for a long time. They’ve very shadily constructed a business model which is part for-profit corporation seperated from their other nonprofit component which appears to serve little purpose other than optics. Most of their funding comes from / came from Google. Their suits make a lot of terrible statements about emerging tech all the time.
This Axios Article looks like somebody tried to convert PowerPoint slides into a webpage.
Did she say anything bad about the Holocaust Promoting before she stepped down or did she just soak in the 2023 Nostalgia?
But you can reach all the middle buttons without changing grip.
The trend was that every younger generation was more progressive than the last. Gen Z polling breaks the trend. Gen Z voted for Trump at a higher rate.
Bitcoin is just below its alltime high. It’s currently worth $109,000 USD per BTC.
Oh, you must be the new owner of Webster and Oxford dictionaries.
Check it out, guys! Its the dude who decides the meaning of words. Round of applause.