Archived link

European leaders should have started preparing for another Trump presidency long ago. They had been warned.

Now, leaders should envisage a world where NATO no longer exists—or where the United States is no longer the leading force in the alliance, writes Phillips Payson O’Brien, Professor of strategic studies at the University of St Andrews, in Scotland. He is the author of The Strategists: Churchill, Stalin, Roosevelt, Mussolini, and Hitler—How War Made Them, and How They Made War.

“In some ways, this is more scary psychologically than in practice. Europe—which is to say, the democratic countries enmeshed in institutions such as NATO and the European Union—has the economic and technological resources to underwrite a serious defense effort. It has a large and educated enough population to staff modern armed forces. It also has some strong and growing military capabilities. For instance, European states either have received or will receive in the coming years as many as 600 F-35 fighters—the most advanced and capable aircraft in the world. Such a force could dominate the skies against a clearly inferior Russian opponent.”

[Edit to include the link.]

  • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    the number of people that can consider geopolitics beyond the childlike concept of goodies and baddies, is very small.

    a learned man like yourself will already know

    Your political views notwithstanding — your condescending attitude is not helping.

    • zante@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Approach the argument in good faith and do me the favour of not yelling political slurs and stalking my comment history, and we’re all good .

      Fair ?