I thought MLs were against reformism and gradualism. They always state that you need mass revolution and a vanguard party. Now you’re telling me that the end result of the revolution and vanguard party is… more gradual reforms???
how long does it take to “fold in” those billionaires into poverty like the people they exploit?
No no, the billionaires (and any landlord at all even including the nice old lady that rented us the punk house, and any small business owners that employ 1+ person other than themselves, and any farmers that won’t give their crop to the glorious revolution™, and…) will be dead and replaced by the autocrats, I mean vanguard party, which will wither away and cede power willingly as they become no longer necessary eventually.
I thought MLs were against reformism and gradualism. They always state that you need mass revolution and a vanguard party. Now you’re telling me that the end result of the revolution and vanguard party is… more gradual reforms???
how long does it take to “fold in” those billionaires into poverty like the people they exploit?
“Gradual reforms, but now those of us in the party are reaping the benefits of the corrupt system instead of those filthy non-party members”
Give us absolute control and we’ll give it back after we created paradise, pinky-swear!
No no, the billionaires (and any landlord at all even including the nice old lady that rented us the punk house, and any small business owners that employ 1+ person other than themselves, and any farmers that won’t give their crop to the glorious revolution™, and…) will be dead and replaced by the autocrats, I mean vanguard party, which will wither away and cede power willingly as they become no longer necessary eventually.
It’s not stupid and naive at all!
What grinds my gears about MLs is they have the nerve to call anarchists naive.
Trust me bro.