• Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 minutes ago

    That sounds extremely low. What young voters are they polling? The Amish?

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    Any CEO (actually, any rich person- the ticket the more this applies) that doesn’t donate obscene amounts to good (good as in “would probably be hated by MAGA” or “politically neutral”) charities can be “acceptably put down”.

    Even more so if they are actively causing direct harm to their customers/clients.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Many things people find despicable are common place in the fog of war. I will never agree with gunning down a poor person no matter what they did, justice is served for the poor daily on a cold lead plate. For the 1%??? Who can we call when insurance kills our loved ones? When Dr’s make intentional mistakes and your loved one is dead? Can you call the police and expect them to go snorkeling to find evidence? Or can you maybe expect a call in a few weeks with a maybe update? We have seen how they respond when one of their masters is murdered. Until there is actual justice for all citizens, there will be no peace. Eat the rich.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    A person has to ask themselves the question of does this person help or hurt humanity, and if you look at this company denials since he took over he definetely hurts humanity as a whole.

    Not every human life is valuable or worth keeping. We need to treat our weakest members of society better, which is elderly, disabled and children. He hurts those people the most, when he should’ve trying to protect them. He chose to chase profits over human life.

    This is simply a logical consequence. Income equality now is FAR worse than the french revolution, I’m just suprised it took this long.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yeah that is shocking. My guess is lots of people declined to say for obvious reasons. The number has to be closer to 80%

    • xenomor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Exactly this. I suspect this group is both young enough to not have to supply their own insurance, or at least young enough to not have faced significant health costs yet. Many people have not yet experienced just how trash the US healthcare system is.

    • 4lan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      You better believe they skewed this poll to get the result they wanted

      I’m willing to bet that most people are indifferent, end of the remainder the vast majority are in support of the killing