bobalot@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoWatching the Generative AI Hype Bubble Deflateash.harvard.eduexternal-linkmessage-square225fedilinkarrow-up1530arrow-down123
arrow-up1507arrow-down1external-linkWatching the Generative AI Hype Bubble Deflateash.harvard.edubobalot@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square225fedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down5·1 day agoToo bad it actively makes all of your work lower quality via the “helping”.
minus-squareAA5B@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·1 day agoJust like every other coworker, it’s important to know what tasks they do well and where they typically need help
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-217 hours agoLmao your stance is really “every coworker makes all product lower quality by nature of existence”? Thats some hardcore Cope you’re smoking.
minus-squareAA5B@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·16 hours agoEvery coworker has a specific type of task they do well and known limits you should pay attention to.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·15 hours agoYes and therefor any two employees must never be allowed to speak to each other. You know, because it makes all of their work worse quality. /s
Too bad it actively makes all of your work lower quality via the “helping”.
Just like every other coworker, it’s important to know what tasks they do well and where they typically need help
Lmao your stance is really “every coworker makes all product lower quality by nature of existence”? Thats some hardcore Cope you’re smoking.
Every coworker has a specific type of task they do well and known limits you should pay attention to.
Yes and therefor any two employees must never be allowed to speak to each other. You know, because it makes all of their work worse quality. /s