• splendoruranium@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It can only be a good thing if the enemy shares the same values, which is not the case with Russia.

    Even if it only leads to reconsidering and restructuring conventional “militaries” then I’d also count that as a drop in the good-bucket. I can’t quite see values factoring into it, what do you mean by that?

    • SethW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You’ve got to be joking acting like you dont understand the stakes of war

      • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You’ve got to be joking acting like you dont understand the stakes of war

        I think there might be some misunderstanding here - what do you think I wrote in my previous post? What am I missing?

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      For example that you cannot just invade other countries to take them over, that you shouldn’t kill people with other religions or sexual preferences, or that your country is superior to all the others.

      • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        For example that you cannot just invade other countries to take them over, that you shouldn’t kill people with other religions or sexual preferences, or that your country is superior to all the others.

        Apologies for not wording that more clearly, but I was not asking for examples of value differences. I was asking why you think value differences make more and more people refusing to risk their lives not a good thing.