McDonald’s is being sued over a hot coffee spill, again.

This time, a San Francisco location is being accused of serving a “scalding” cup of coffee with an improperly attached lid, which allegedly resulted in the coffee pouring out on plaintiff Mable Childress’ body and causing “severe burns” after she tried drinking it.

The lawsuit, filed last week, alleged that the elderly woman is suffering from “physical pains, emotional distress and other damages.” The restaurant’s negligence was a “substantial factor” for her injuries, it alleged.

Childress also said in the lawsuit that the restaurant employees “refused” to help her, a point that the McDonald’s denied.

  • JDubbleu@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They determined that the average customer stayed in a given McDonald’s after ordering for x minutes, so they made the coffee so hot it couldn’t be consumed within x minutes in an attempt to get people not to utilize their free refills on coffee. The coffee was so hot it was dangerous. All to save a customer from getting 2 more cents worth of coffee.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shareholders don’t ruin someone’s life in exchange for an extra 0.0001% return this quarter challenge (impossible)

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought it was so the coffee would still be hot by the time you got to wherever you were driving to. Your explanation makes a lot more sense though.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It makes a lot more sense if you presume malice. I put incompetence up top, followed by another explanation on this thread that the idea was to keep your coffee hot until you get to your destination.