Facing a pileup of spending bills and a possible government shutdown, 20 Republican senators led by Sen. Rick Scott (Fla.) say they will delay any legislation moving on the Senate floor that does not relate directly to funding the government.
Scott circulated a letter at the Senate Republican lunch Wednesday warning Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) that GOP lawmakers will not tolerate further delay to the annual appropriations bills, none of which has yet passed the Senate.
“Nothing can stand in the way of this work. For this reason, we the undersigned senators pledge to withhold our support for any vote to proceed to items unrelated to appropriations bills,” the senators wrote.
The GOP senators are warning Schumer not to bring any non-appropriations bills to the Senate floor because they fear that letting the spending legislation pile up until December will inevitably lead to Congress passing another massive omnibus spending package.
“We urge you to present a plan to the Republican Conference for how you intend to pass the remaining appropriations bills and conference them with the House in a manner that respects an open amendment process and which does not end in a December omnibus spending package,” they wrote.
The senators, however, pledged to consider the spending bills “expeditiously” if Schumer commits to a plan for passing them in an orderly way and with an open amendment process.
The signatories include Senate Republican Whip John Thune (S.D.), Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Senate Republican Conference Chairman John Barrasso (Wyo.), GOP Policy Committee Chairwoman Joni Ernst (Iowa) and GOP Conference Vice Chairwoman Shelley Moore-Capito (W.Va.).
Sens. Mike Braun (Ind.), Katie Britt (Ala.), Ted Cruz (Texas), Mike Lee (Utah), Kevin Cramer (N.D.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (Miss.), Ron Johnson (Wis.), Cynthia Lummis (Wyo.), Roger Marshall (Kan.), Eric Schmitt (Mo.), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Tommy Tuberville (Ala.) and Roger Wicker (Miss.) also signed the letter.
Republicans on Wednesday expressed frustration over Schumer’s decision not to bring a spending bill to the floor this week before senators leave for the Columbus Day recess.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the vice chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said she was puzzled why Schumer instead scheduled votes on noncontroversial nominees this week.
Cornyn on Tuesday called for Schumer to cancel the recess so senators would have more time to debate the annual spending days.
“We had 45 days from Saturday to fund the government on an ongoing basis, and the majority leader has chosen to send the members of the Senate home for the next two weeks. It’s outrageous. It’s irresponsible. The American people deserve better,” he said.
Cornyn on Wednesday told Schumer to “quit wasting time” and get moving on the appropriations bills right away.
That sentiment was echoed by the senators who signed Scott’s letter to Schumer.
“There is no more important work for the Senate during this time than debating, amending and passing appropriations bills without resorting to a giant package dumped on the conference right before the December holiday,” they wrote.
This reads like Republicans trying to shift blame from themselves, for shutting down the House and preventing any budget from passing, to Democrats for waiting until the House gets its shit together and can negotiate. You can fully expect these fuckers to make the media rounds the next couple weeks blaming Schumer for not passing a bill that would be DOA due to Republican dysfunction in the House
Also, if you haven’t yet, search “Rick Scott Medicare Fraud”
Yep, this is transparent blame-shifting. There’s no point in debating a spending bill that doesn’t exist and the GOP just ousted their own Speaker, and there’s no reason not to vote on unrelated matters while they wait for the House to get their shit together.
Unfortunately, conservative voters will accept whatever talking points they are fed.
Also, open amendments. So they could take good bills and make them bad bills.
So, Scott et al are pretending they can pass a budget without the House?
Without the house that the GOP beheaded.
Let the attack on the United States, from the inside continue. We know who the enemy is, we should be taking them out in the most humane way possible maybe
By voting them out?
You may not like Mitch McConnell, But you really won’t like Rick Scott.
deleted by creator
All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills…
I really hate that prick.
GOP: destroying America, one day at a time.
He worried that Senator Football might actually change his mind on having the military with no leadership due to him being upset about military travel reimbursement?
Budget bills must originate in the House, correct?
Rick Scott send out emails monthly and he is such a shit bag fraud liar it’s not surprising that all Florida politicians resemble Rudy Russo.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The senators, however, pledged to consider the spending bills “expeditiously” if Schumer commits to a plan for passing them in an orderly way and with an open amendment process.
), Katie Britt (Ala.), Ted Cruz (Texas), Mike Lee (Utah), Kevin Cramer (N.D.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (Miss.
Republicans on Wednesday expressed frustration over Schumer’s decision not to bring a spending bill to the floor this week before senators leave for the Columbus Day recess.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the vice chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said she was puzzled why Schumer instead scheduled votes on noncontroversial nominees this week.
“We had 45 days from Saturday to fund the government on an ongoing basis, and the majority leader has chosen to send the members of the Senate home for the next two weeks.
“There is no more important work for the Senate during this time than debating, amending and passing appropriations bills without resorting to a giant package dumped on the conference right before the December holiday,” they wrote.
The original article contains 496 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
While ejecting McCarthy was politically correct, it feels like a lapse in judgement if you actually care about governing this country properly.
If you wonder why, let’s see how well this comment ages in 3 months or so.
