(Graphical) IDE’s are great for development, but they’re slow to start and heavy to run. Sometimes you just want to take a quick look at an xml or dockerfile and you don’t want to spin up the whole IDE for that.

I’ve recently rediscovered notepad++ for that (on windows), what’s your prefered easy-acces-tekst-editor?

  • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
    20·
    1 year ago

    Helix. Instant startup. Minimal configuration required. Has all of the killer features I want from an IDE anyway.

    EDIT: I assumed people would just research this anyway, but a more complete list of features I enjoy from Helix:

    • very responsive
    • modal editing
    • declarative configuration file format (TOML, not Lua)
    • language server protocol
    • debug adapter protocol
    • written in Rust so I am more likely to be able to submit a PR if I need to

    Some cons (all known issues on github):

    • no plugin API yet
    • inline LSP diagnostics are overly intrusive and can overlap your code
    • cold-starts the LSP when you start the editor, so you might need to wait for symbol queries in a large project
    • jennraeross@lemmy.world
      6·
      1 year ago

      Helix deserves more love. Blazing fast, sensible defaults, good lsp support, vim-ish bindings. It’s really my perfect editor

      • beefsack@lemmy.world
        2·
        1 year ago

        It’s such a cool editor, but after decades of Vim motor memory I just can’t seem to wrap my head around the cursor / selection changes. I really wish there was an option to just make selection work like Vim.

        • jennraeross@lemmy.world
          3·
          1 year ago

          For anyone trying it out for the first time: If you aren’t sure how to do something, it’s probably hitting the spacebar in normal mode. That will bring up a list of shortcuts, including the debugging, file chooser, and actions (for the lip)

  • bus_factor@lemmy.world
    222·
    1 year ago

    vim. Just basic vim, I don’t jazz it up to be all IDE-like. I want my vim to behave exactly like it would if I’m on some random other computer.

    If I need autocomplete, ability to jump to the definition of stuff and so forth I use whatever the other people on the project use, which is often vscode these days.

    • uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      3·
      1 year ago

      exactly this. If I need to do development, i’ll use a jetbrains product. If i’m in a pure text editing situation, I want the most powerful thing for manipulating text, and I want it to be available.

    • Synthead@lemmy.world
      2·
      1 year ago

      You don’t enjoy a plugin like gutentags? You’re missing out. Don’t let your principles get in the way of your productivity.

  • Big P@feddit.ukEnglish
    13·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t normally point out a spelling mistake but… Why did you spell text like that?

    • sping@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      I’d call that an IDE, but also one that makes using a non-IDE editor superfluous.

        • sping@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          The biggest irony is it’s often told by vim fanboys, who apparently don’t realize a very comprehensive emulator of vim it is one of the editors Emacs offers. But mostly it seems to be told by people who don’t even know what Emacs is, they just know they’re meant to disapprove of it.

          • V H@lemmy.stad.social
            1·
            1 year ago

            Frankly, I’ve seen it more often from Emacs users themselves, including while I used it myself for ~20+ years.

      • abbadon420@lemm.eeOP
        1·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I’d call Emac and Vim both IDE’s. They’re definitely not “just” text editors.

        • uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          5·
          1 year ago

          Vim can have some IDE-like qualities, if you bolt enough plugins in to it, but by default it affords buttinx text in a file and manipulating it.

          I woudn’t classify it as an ide though.

      • trollercoaster@feddit.de
        1·
        1 year ago

        Hadn’t looked into that for a long time, will try. I think the biggest hurdle for me might be native Windows terminals still being shit.

          • floofloof@lemmy.caEnglish
            1·
            1 year ago

            It’s the best solution for editing huge text files in Windows. The other text editors slow to a crawl with big files, but gvim has no problem.

  • atyaz@reddthat.com
    71·
    1 year ago

    This is going to be a boring answer but I use neovim. I do use it as my ide as well but it’s so fast and lightweight that when I need to edit a random config file or something, I just start another instance of it.

  • V H@lemmy.stad.social
    6·
    1 year ago

    My own. My Emacs config grew over years to several thousand lines, and it got to a point where I decided I could write an editor in fewer lines that it took to configure Emacs how I liked it. It’s … not for everyone. I’m happy with it, because it does exactly only the things I want it to, and nothing else, but it does also mean getting used to quirks you can’t be bothered to fix, and not getting to blame someone else when you run into a bug.

    That said, writing your own editor is easier than people think, as long as you leverage libraries for whichever things you don’t have a pressing need to customize (e.g. mine is written in Ruby, and I use Rouge for syntax highlighting, and I believe Rouge is more lines of code than the editor itself thanks to all the lexers)

  • ono@lemmy.caEnglish
    61·
    1 year ago

    Geany or (with a lot of reconfiguration) Kate.

    Geany is built upon the same text edit control as Notepad++.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      31·
      1 year ago

      Same for me, I even use it on Mac OS X too (which somehow still doesn’t ship with a basic text editor).