cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agoWebpimagemessage-square234linkfedilinkarrow-up1778arrow-down1163
arrow-up1615arrow-down1imageWebpcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square234linkfedilink
minus-square𝕨𝕒𝕤𝕒𝕓𝕚@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up66arrow-down2·2 months agoQuality loss? Webp supports lossless.
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·2 months agoSo does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
minus-squareMower2560@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoActually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
minus-squarefilcuk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 months agoPractically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.
Quality loss? Webp supports lossless.
So does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
Actually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
Practically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.