

No, that would be one of the worst options. There are far better ones. Not going to advise those either though – substance dependency is not a pleasant thing for anyone.


No, that would be one of the worst options. There are far better ones. Not going to advise those either though – substance dependency is not a pleasant thing for anyone.


Make your own future! Go outside, tell a stranger this beautiful story!
(get thrown in jail)
Shucks. Mental healthcare is overloaded in probably most of the world right now, sure is over here in the EU as well. Fortunately, there are a lot of professionals available, though waitlists exist. Hopefully we can catch up eventually, soon.


Depends a bit on the player, though you do make a solid point. It is also a matter of preference, of course.
I see no logic in this statement. Please explain?
Sorry to hear you have so few wise people over there.


Thank you, do not need to try it, as the view has been presented before… You are missing the gist of my message. I am talking about controlling someone, which should instead “be” someone.
That is a culture problem, unfortunately. :(
This is hilarious xD


Uhh… I am sorry. What you said means nothing to me.
We all live in this world, yes. Society is unavoidable. However, you can choose to what extent you engage with it. There is a minimum, stop using tech ~ go out into the world and meet people, create physical things etc. – nobody will stop you when you act with integrity and love.


Have no idea who that is. However, what is the worst that could happen? Variation is interesting!
The correct psychologist will be able to tell without testing.
Being honest is much more effective. Feels scary. Fear is never a good guide.
Do not do it all the time unless the Dr. prescribed and when you do: responsibly.
Different people react differently to molecules. In some people (I think higher prevalency in people with Autism/AD(H)D) the THC is more likely to cause psychosis.
These things are not “one size fits all”, at all.