• fievel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 months ago

    A good one IMHO is Omnivore.

    Omnivore is a complete, open source read-it-later solution for people who love to read.

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s my first time seeing an OSS app that doesn’t at least have an own F-Droid repo, if it isn’t already in the official F-Droid repo.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Thanks for this. I don’t usually dive into longer format article stuff because I find it on my phone and reading on my phone sucks. I tried pocket, but it didn’t function at all on my reader.

      This solves that problem reasonably well.

      (Edit: also an RSS reader? Maybe I should start using RSS again. I do wish it offered paged navigation controls to better work on an ereader, but it’s definitely an improvement still.)

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    No, I’ve never really understood the point. I have bookmarks in my browser if I want to save something for later. I don’t really need anything more fancy than that.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t use pocket any more but I tried it out. I think the benefit was that you had the sync of articles to read between all devices with pocket.

      Personally, I use a browser for specific sites or searches. I use apps like Lemmy (connect) for content discovery pocket is a bridge between the two. It also allowed sharing between peopke. So rather than sharing a link by email or WhatsApp, I’d just add it to their pocket.

    • moreeni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Came here to say the exact same thing. People really do love to reinvent browser bookmarks.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think most people these days don’t use browser bookmarks as a “check this out later” tool, and instead as more of a “I frequently need to access this page” function. For me, I only bookmark a page if it’s something I frequently access; things like my email, Lemmy, some work apps, etc. In my use-case, bookmarks are a more “permanent” installation to my browser.

        Also, “read later” apps generally strip the web page formatting and advertisements, and usually have an offline function of some sort; both of which you typically can’t do with bookmarks. These are especially useful for those who like to read on their commute.

        • moreeni@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think most people these days don’t use browser bookmarks as a “check this out later” tool, and instead as more of a “I frequently need to access this page” function.

          So what’s preventing those people from using bookmarks as “check this out later” tool? The personal preference of using an app that reinvented those same bookmarks? Just create a “read-it-later” later directory and boom, you’re good to go.

          Also, “read later” apps generally strip the web page formatting and advertisements, and usually have an offline function of some sort; both of which you typically can’t do with bookmarks.

          Yeah, because these are features typically provided by your browser. Hence, browser bookmarks. It’s not a unique feature to read-it-later apps in any way.

    • compostgoblin@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I use Inoreader to read RSS feeds of my favorite sources, and I save interesting articles to Pocket. I use the tagging feature and sync my Pocket entries to an Obsidian vault using an extension. It creates a web of information I found valuable enough to save, connected by tag. It helps me see trends and topics I’m interested in emerge over time

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The general difference is that these bookmarks go away when re-opened. They’re an alternative to leaving a buttload of tabs open.

  • cfi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    I use Wallabag in the sense that I save articles to it, but I only really read them when I don’t have service or on my e-reader

    • krash@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I subscribed to wallabag, but there are so many rough edges I gave up on it after six months. Terrible experience 😕

  • krash@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    I use omnivore for longer articles and highlighting parts of the text. It also have a plugin to sync with obsidian. It’s really good, but I imagine self-hosting it can be tricky.

    For a link-dump, I use Shiori. Could be anything vaguely interesting but I want to take a look later - works wonders for that.

    And I have been a former pocket user, wallabag… But I stick with omnivore and Shiori.

  • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I use Readeck which has a few extra features over Pocket and bookmarks: offline copy, sharable link to said copy, highlights, bookmarks collection and the ability to export saved articles to ebook. Oh and it’s self-hostable.

    Personnaly, I mostly use it to bookmark and highlight articles I have read, with some bookmarked to read later.

  • mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yes I use pocket and am fairly satisfied.

    Why do I use it? Well, I have been using it for about 6 years, was the first thing to work fine in my mobile, don’t want to install another extension in ff, hate bookmark handling by ff (at least in mobile), and want to push myself in reading.

    Although I nowadays see too much american articles in pocket to be relevant for me.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Neither, especially with Pocket. There’s something about an add-on integrated into a browser that makes me worry about privacy. I hate how pocket is bundled in Firefox and take great pleasure in disabling it in the browser’s config file. If it was something that could be downloaded on your own I might have had a different opinion about it. I just make a bookmark folder for articles I want to read later. It takes a few extra seconds to store and access but I think it’s worth it.

  • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have a Firefox plugin called Tranquility Reader, which basically strips out all the ads and bullshit and gives you the article as just plain text on a white background. It also has the option to save the page as a pdf, so if I want to read something later I just do that.

  • PatheticGroundThing@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I tried to use Pocket because of Mozilla’s relentless promotion, but I ended up finding it too clunky compared to regular bookmarks.