• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dunno, do you have nuclear weapons that could cause the apocalypse?

    Countries aren’t people. The scale the work on is much greater.

    • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’ve got an important word there. Scale.

      Countries aren’t people but they’re made up of them. It wouldn’t take nuclear weapons to annihilate your household.

      Russia has invaded Ukraine’s home and tried to lay claim. Now you’re suggesting they give up what was taken from them to satisfy your desire for peace.

      The analogy the other person used is fair. In another analogy Russia is nothing more than a bully. We’ve long moved past the time where the advice we give is to just give the bully your money so they don’t beat you up and take it anyway.

      • Bloops@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is no such thing as a society, only individuals and families. Very true Maggie!

        No, countries are qualitatively different from simply “lots of people”

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bullies also don’t have nuclear weapons.

        Stop comparing people to countries. The scale makes it so absurd, because nuclear weapons could end the god damn world.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            You were using an analogy where a bully threatens to beat you up and take your money.

            That’s nothing like the current situation. The current situation is a nuclear armed nation is willing to wage an endless war and we’re throwing money and bombs and tanks at the problem trying to make it go away. You’re comparing small scale things to nuclear scale things and it’s really just absurd.

            • hypelightfly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You were using an analogy where a bully threatens to beat you up and take your money.

              No, I wasn’t.

              That’s nothing like the current situation. The current situation is a nuclear armed nation is willing to wage an endless war and we’re throwing money and bombs and tanks at the problem trying to make it go away.

              No, it’s not.

              You’re comparing small scale things to nuclear scale things and it’s really just absurd.

              No, I’m not.

        • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          By your logic, no one should stand up to the US either because we have enough glowy ordinance to turn Russia, China, and Iran into glass and have enough nukes to end all life a million times over.

    • danny@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The thing with nukes is that it’s suicide, and they know it. So they just use the threat of it to get whatever they want, in the hopes that the people in charge are like you and will just flop over to their demands whenever they dangle the threat.