renzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoI have the weirdest aesthetic preferenceslemmy.worldimagemessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up1768arrow-down128
arrow-up1740arrow-down1imageI have the weirdest aesthetic preferenceslemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-213 hours agoQR codes have built in redundancy and error correction, though. I guess if they had it turned up to the max for some reason?
minus-squareNoxy@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoyeah, qr codes have different levels of error correction that you can specify, could very be well turned up to the max or the url has a ton of tracking params appended to it for some reason
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour ago or the url has a ton of tracking params appended to it for some reason Ideally you should use a short URL that redirects to the full URL. The tracking parameters should be on the long URL, not the short one.
minus-squareWaxedWookie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 hours agoYeah - that’d be my guess for an over-complicated code with minimal info.
QR codes have built in redundancy and error correction, though. I guess if they had it turned up to the max for some reason?
yeah, qr codes have different levels of error correction that you can specify, could very be well turned up to the max
or the url has a ton of tracking params appended to it for some reason
Ideally you should use a short URL that redirects to the full URL. The tracking parameters should be on the long URL, not the short one.
Yeah - that’d be my guess for an over-complicated code with minimal info.