• Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      Admittedly I was in school multiple decades ago, but our teachers wanted us to memorize addition and multiplication tables. Which of course made anything outside the tables hard to do. I (and others apparently) thought it would be a great idea to use shortcuts like this.

      So many failed tests. So many. When teachers saw us write down that we took the 21 apples multiplied by 7 bushels and just did 2x7, and tack a 7 on the end, they broke out the red pen.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 minutes ago

    I realized something. I relate so much to ADHD memes not because i have it but because they simply do a lot of things that they think only people with ADHD do. In my school they encouraged you to come up with techniques like this. Often 9 is hungry in different ways. Another exmple is multiplication. 5099 is 50100-50 which is much easier to calculate.

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You’re old school, like me. You’re literally describing the “new math” that boomers hate. Teachers are finally teaching kids to do it the way we’ve always done it in our head.

    “8 + 7 is awkward, but if you take two from seven and give it to eight, now you have 10 + 5 and that’s easy mental math.”

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 hour ago

      And the reason they teach it that way is because it’s what the people who are good at math were already doing. Math isn’t about memorization it’s about understanding how numbers work and that’s how numbers work

  • peteypete420@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    No no no. Adding nine is just subtracting one, but adding to the front digit. 9 + 7 is actually 7 - 1=6, then add that 1 to the front. 16. Let’s not make more complicated than it needs to be.

    • don@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Someone, usually a person (speaking in italibold): not like that, you heathen

  • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It took me 3 years to pass HS algebra because the coaches/part-time math teachers didn’t like the way I solved problems. I got the right answers. But the way I got them was wrong apparently.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    If your teacher gets mad about breaking an addition problem into easier problems, then that teacher should be fired. Phony tale.

    • don@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      But they posted in italibold, which makes it 420.69% leejit. pwned.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      If anything, these are exactly the techniques that “New Math” was supposed to teach. Your brain doesn’t work math the same way as a computer. People who are good at math tend to break the whole thing down into simple pieces like this. New Math was developed by studying what they did and then teaching that to everyone.

      I tend to add 9 to things by bumping the tens digit up by one (7 becomes 17) and then subtracting 1 (17 becomes 16).

      Most of the arguments against New Math tended to prove the point; our mathematical education was in dire need of fixing.

    • Fatticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I thought that too, 9 is like a halogen, it wants to resolve to 10 anyway it can like fluorine wants one last electron. So allow the 9 to rip one off of the neighboring numbers and then perform the calculation.

      • NerdyPopRocks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’ve never really liked the anthropomorphic description of chemical bonding, but maybe it’s actually similar to the addition thing. On the one hand, we can say 9 wants to resolve to 10 and takes a 1, and on the other hand we could say there are a bunch of different ways we could rearrange these numbers but the end result is the same as if we resolve 9 to 10 first. Maybe chemical reactions are similar, so there’s a bunch of configurations that could have happened, but the end result is the same as if we had said fluorine wants that last electron