Summary

Project 2025, a manifesto supported by the conservative Heritage Foundation, calls for a ban on pornography, labeling its purveyors as criminals and advocating for strict penalties, including jail time for producers and registered sex offender status for educators distributing it.

The manifesto argues that porn lacks First Amendment protection, framing it as harmful and exploitative.

With a right-leaning Supreme Court, proponents aim to overturn existing protections established in Miller v. California, potentially impacting mainstream media.

Donald Trump has pledged to bring Project 2025 contributors onto his team.

  • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    First, they came for the trans people* and I did nothing because I am not trans.
    Then they came for the immigrants and I did nothing because I am not an immigrant.
    Then they came for women’s rights and I did nothing because I am not a woman.
    Then they came for the… wait, what? Hold up!


    * They came really hard for the trans people. Like strangely hard. Like they had some find of fixation.

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Its already psuedo-banned in some states, not outright, but PornHub and others are blocked in a number of states.

    You could probably take an educated guess as to which states with nearly 100% accuracy.

    It was their trial run, now they want to deploy that nationwide, incrementally chipping away at it.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      First president to have actual nude photos of his wife available.

      If any other president, especially a Democrat, had nudes of their wife it would be a scandal.

      But America is so beholden to these idiots that it doesn’t even matter to anyone.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        There are lots of things they do that’re scandalous. That’s not one of them. There’s already enough puritanical bullshit fucking up the US. It’s about time some of it were left in the past.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Doesn’t this proposal also make anyone who participates in the production of porn into a criminal?

      Is the first Lady going to get arrested for her involvement in the creation of porn?

      • Squorlple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 days ago

        Historically, you can’t be charged for crimes you committed before the law criminalizing them was passed. However, precedence and fair application of the law have lost all meaning so you could be arrested, but she wouldn’t.

  • SwampYankee@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    8 days ago

    registered sex offender status for educators distributing it

    If a book in your classroom or school library has anything beyond a heterosexual peck on the cheek, congratulations, you’re now a sex offender. Not a joke.

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      8 days ago

      Oh boy, I can’t wait for abstinance to be taught as the only form of sexual education in America.

        • AreaKode@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          8 days ago

          When the schools close, I guess everybody has to go to Christian school now! No sex education at all, please!

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 days ago

        In my school in the Bible belt that was primarily what they focused on. I don’t remember much time being given to condoms. I certainly don’t remember ever being given one or shown how to use it (not that it’s that difficult or anything, but still).

        But what I do remember is a speaker coming to our school to talk to us about how he had sex outside of marriage and got a girl pregnant, but he did the right thing and got married. Also, and I cannot stress this enough, he described this as abstaining because he married the person he had sex with.

      • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        That was mine… In the early 00s. And again with a guest speaker… In my advanced marketing class… In the late 00s. I will never forget how that lady sat on a desk, explaining with vivid, passionate excitement and lust, how waiting for your life partner to be your first time is, moans and quivers, so good~

        The fuck, Smith, I thought we were going to fuck around and watch movies while you go “make some copies” only to never return, like every other day. The fuck is this shit. Even your own kid in this class is visibly distraught and confused. Poor guy is fucking scarred for life.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      Well fuck as a published writer who has gsy characters in my books does that mean I will be labeled under this?

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I hope they actually do it. This is like the abortion issue, if they actually go through with it people will be like “What?? How could this happen??”

  • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Historically speaking people have two things they riot for, safety and comfort. How that comfort manifest varies but pornography is definitely on the same level as whiskey, and the United states has had a rebellion on that.

    • teamevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      And somehow we just elected a guy who has no qualms with turning the military and the police on its own citizens despite legal doctrine.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Well luckily the military has a good chance of not listening to him, atleast in my opinion. The police on the other hand are more of a threat, though not an insurmountable one.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          The liberal officers are going to resign in protest then pat themselves on the back and call it integrity.

          Then the fascists are going to follow orders.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Luckily the chain of command helps dilute the worst of this type of effect. As I understand it most orders will have to go through the folks at the Pentagon first and they could very well just say no or otherwise pull some malicious compliance.

            Reminder the military has a more or less parallel system to the civil system. Its entirely possible they may just decide to separate themselves more or less.

              • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                I live in an area with veterans and its a bit more of a mixed bag. Most of them are dissolutioned with the system, its not that they dont have political leanings they just hate both. The ones who are politically active are usually lowd and dumb as fuck Republicans, the JD Vance type. The few I met who were commissioned officers were fucking feral and had nothing good to say about the right.

                Remember the split in the veterans will be based broadly on education similar to the general public. And frankly speaking the actual folks at the Pentagon are pretty well educated.

                Also I will happily admit that this is me hoping for a somewhat workable scenario. Im Californian which means I am in the perfectly cooked chicken zone of this soon to be nuclear blast, watching a bunch of mush brained dipshits play with the nuke. I practically cant do fuck all.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            Honestly a good amount of that shit is of questionable function, reminder most of the good shit is going to the national guard first. The police are at best using old ass NVG and optics, maybe they have a functional IFV but itll be of questionable maintenance. My local police department gave up and just has the Sheriff department do anything that requires more than a rifle, mostly cause the mechanics refused to work on the humvee they got.

            Also the police arent exactly trained for an actual resistance movement, itll be likely a more embarrassing version of the union and county wars.

              • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 days ago

                Honestly fhe worst that can happen is the engine decides its in fact a fire pit. Otherwise it will just be a boring ass breakdown, transmission failure is pretty common in military vehicles as a general rule. Reminder the US military is a logistics network with an army meaning that just cause they can keep a vehicle running doesnt mean even the oversized budget of LAPD can.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    The porn ban will just be the excuse they use to crack down on VPNs so they can implement a full on Chinese style internet censorship program.

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Goof luck for the companies depending on VPNs…but hey, Donnie’s going to crash the economy anyway, so why fret.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Oh man do I ever hope they ban porn in the US. That would be fucking hilarious.

  • Joker@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    People who voted for Trump after he won:

    The same people after he declare porn illegal.