TP-link is reportedly being investigated over national security concerns linked to vulnerabilities in its very popular routers.

  • frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Running OpenWRT is generally a good idea. I’m not gonna lie and say it’s easy to setup. But it’s worth it.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      It’s a good idea, but there’s going to be firmware at lower levels (roughly the BIOS) that could still be compromised. It’s best to just not buy Chinese hardware designed and manufactured by a Chinese company with no western involvement when you can avoid it.

      • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        This didn’t even occur to me when I bought my new router recently. I just went with one of the best-reviewed models that had all the features and speed I needed.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        An even better way is to leave vulnerable pieces in all parts of the firmware / software stack. E.g. old version of SSH with a known vulnerability or two, old web server, etc. Then just exploit as needed.

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The examples you gave are all at the OS level and installing OpenWRT would fix them. The firmware/BIOS level is much more custom and can be susceptible to attacks the OS is completely unaware of (effectively pre-installed rootkits). Hence why I mentioned it may not be enough to install OpenWRT.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 minutes ago

            Yes of course, you’re right. The point I’m making is that wherever you’re putting in backdoors, instead of backdoors, you can just leave unlatched vulnerabilities. Gives you solid plausible deniability.