• schmidtster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    181
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well I mean it did work. You have now shared it and made it a meme for others to enjoy, it’s fulfilled it’s task successfully.

  • Monkeyhog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m certain this is absolutely hilarious in robot, you’re just too fleshy and inefficient to understand.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      As a non robot and definitely a human person who is of the homo sapiens species, I can tell you that this humorous meme is quite hilarious to those of us who have soft bodies and are not made of any mechanical parts whatsoever. I suspect suspect suspect suspect you of being a robot in disguise! Everyone get them!

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    JhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJ hZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJh ZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZ JhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJ…

    The Aristocrats!

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I prefer hexadecimal. The encoded data in its entirety is

        89 50 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A 
        00 00 00 0D 49 48 44 52 
        00 00 01 2C 00 00 01 2C 
        08 06 00 00 00 B9 B4 AC 
        33 00 00 01 A4 49 44 41 
        54 78 9C ED DD 41 8E 83 
        40 10 85 E1 7F 7F E4 B2 
        72 25 92 61 64 98 59 26 
        16 49 85 92 61 64 98 59 
        26 16 49 85 92 61 64 98 
        59 26 16 49 85 92 61 64 
        98 59 26 16 49 85 92 61 
        64 98 59 26 16 49 85 92 
        61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85 
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 
        85 92 61 64 98 59 26 16 
        49 85 92 61 64 98 59 26 
        16 49 85 92 61 64 98 59 
        26 16 49 85 92 61 64 98 
        59 26 16 49 85 92 61 64 
        98 59 26 16 49 85 92 61 
        64 98 59 26 16 49 85 92 
        61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85 
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 
        85 92 61 64 98 59 26 16 
        49 85 92 61 64 98 59 26 
        16 49 85 92 61 64 98 59 
        26 16 49 85 92 61 64 98 
        59 26 16 49 85 92 61 64 
        98 59 26 1(abrupt end at 4 bits of last byte)
        

        We can analyze the PNG file header. Surprisingly, some of it makes sense.

        89 50 4E 47 0D 0A 1A 0A //PNG signature (0x89 P N G 0xD 0xA 0x1A 0xA)
        
        00 00 00 0D // Start of chunk with data length 13 bytes
        49 48 44 52 // Type of chunk: IHDR (image header)
        00 00 01 2C // Width: 300 px
        00 00 01 2C // Height: 300 px 
        08 // Bits per color channel: 8 
        06 // Color format: 6 (RGBA)
        00 // Compression method: 0 (DEFLATE)
        00 // Filter method: 0 (Adaptive)
        00 // Interlace method: 0 (None)
        B9 B4 AC 33 // CRC-32 of chunk (invalid, should be 79 7D 8E 75)
        
        00 00 01 A4 // Start of chunk with data length 420 bytes
        49 44 41 54 // Type of chunk: IDAT (image data)
        78 9C ED DD 41 8E 83 40 
        10 85 E1 7F 7F E4 B2 72 25 
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 16 49 85
        92 61 64 98 59 26 1
        // 194.5 of the expected 420 data bytes, invalid when attempting to deflate
        // the deflate algorithm needs a Huffman tree but an unfull one is presented
        

        Credits to the PNG chunk inspector at nayuki.io

        You may try to figure out if the header checksum was stolen from elsewhere and corresponds to another common image size but I cannot be bothered. The data could be subjected to forensic analysis but we only really have 21 unique bytes, the rest is likely nonsense because data encoded by the DEFLATE algorithm is unlikely to be so repetitive. Also, the image in total will likely have just 481 bytes (8+(8+13+4)+(8+420+4)+16), as a less-than-65535-byte IDAT chunk tends to be the last one before a 16-byte trailer. There are very few 300x300 PNGs of such small size we could call memes, most of it will have to be just solid color. Example of a 256x256 map tile you can store in around that size (467 B):
        OSM tile for Crozet Islands at around 1:10 000 000 scale, the archipelago the area of Malta is represented by about 10 white pixels with the exclusive economic zone circles of radius 5 px around the islands
        (And this one is pre-optimized, using an indexed palette of just 13 distinct RGB colors as opposed to the full RGBA gamut!)

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    “come up with a funny comment to post on lemmy”

    “Sure, I can try to generate a funny comment for you. Lemmy is a federated link aggregator and discussion platform, similar to Reddit. Here are some possible comments you can post on lemmy:

    • I just joined lemmy and I’m loving it. It’s like reddit, but without the ads, censorship, and corporate overlords.
    • Lemmy is the best thing since sliced bread. Literally. I haven’t eaten anything since I discovered this site.
    • How do you pronounce lemmy? Is it leh-mee, lee-mee, or lay-mee? I need to know before I start a podcast about it.
    • Lemmy is so addictive, I can’t stop browsing it. I’ve been on it for 12 hours straight. Send help. And upvotes.
    • I’m new to lemmy and I have a question. How do I get karma? Do I need to post memes, cat pictures, or political opinions? Or do I just need to be nice and helpful?

    I hope you find these comments amusing and suitable for lemmy. 😄”

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Christ, why even have people anymore? Just have ChatGPT be all the users. It’s already indistinguishable.

        • flontlocs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          Just doing a search for “I am an AI Language model” (with quotes) is enough to reveal a bunch of those loser ass accounts.

      • paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        I actually wonder what a purely AI/ChatGPT community would look like (no human posts/comments allowed), would they eventually start to develop their own weird culture, memes, inside comment jokes that nobody would even understand? There’d be like a picture of a tire and a rubber ducky with the text reading “Five fingers / garden hose” and all the comments would be things like “The wombat, in ascension, remembers. Nautilus.” Like how fucking weird would they get without human intervention?

        • deur@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          We had that on reddit, subreddit simulator I think? It was a more primitive version of LLM, and it didn’t train itself on content from the simulator sub.

      • darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Come up for a reply to this quote: “Christ, why even have people anymore? Just have ChatGPT be all the users. It’s already indistinguishable.”

        ChatGPT:

        While ChatGPT has made remarkable progress, human connection adds depth and emotion that technology alone may struggle to replicate. Let’s appreciate the unique qualities each brings to the table.

  • superbirra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 months ago

    it’s meta and some assembly is required: the meme is the broken response so you can screenshot it and post on lemmy

    • EvokerKing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      The response isn’t even broken. It’s not finished. It gives responses in markdown, same as Lemmy. That is the syntax for a picture embed, it’s just still typing the rest and it doesn’t show it until it’s finished typing.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I analyzed it in another comment: the header says the image is 300x300px 8-bit RGBA but the data is invalid. Most viewers will notice that and show an error.

        However, the syntax it used for embedding images is valid, as data:image/png;base64, is the start of a valid image URL and you can use it like other image URLs in supported Markdown interpretors.

        Example, using the 103-byte Google Maps’ sea tiles, and a 178-byte GIF:

        ![Google Maps sea map tile]()
        ![wink.gif]()
        

        renders as

        Google Maps sea map tile wink.gif

        Works in the default web interface

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      To be fair, it did spit out a couple of completely nonsensical images afterwards:

      I think the AI might be biased against dogs.

      • lseif@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        did it give you the images in base64 from an llm, or from an image generation model ?

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I think you can guess that part. I doubt a current LLM can create a valid PNG, even if it’s just a 1x1px one that has been created before. This is partially because PNGs have a checksum and the LLM has definitely not seen enough PNGs in base64 to figure out the algorithm, and is not optimized to calculate checksums. In fact, I analyzed the image and the image header checksum is wrong even though the header makes sense (was likely stolen). Also, it gets penalized for repetition, which occurs a lot in image headers.

          AFAIK, the smallest valid image you see mentioned on the web is a 35-byte transparent pixel GIF, and the smallest PNG is a black pixel with 67 bytes:

          
          
          

          Testing rendering: Alt text for the GIF; if you see it, it failed, Alt text for the PNG; if you see it, it failed, another 67-byte PNG but 8 px wide: , or 1 gray pixel: , or a green one:

          The article + the generator

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    JhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJ hZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJh ZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZ

    🤣

  • markon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s amazing how Microsoft can take good models and absolutely ruin them in production… ChatGPT isn’t perfect but it’s like the difference between talking to the wall and talking to an avg IQ person that has reasoning capabilities in many domains that equals or exceeds human performance, if the user knows how to get the best prompt. That changes a little every time they do major model updates though.

    I’ve had more intelligent conversations with my own computer running a 3 billion parameter open source model. They must be wasting an incredible amount of money. Especially with GPT-4 considering it produces pretty shit results through Bing Chat…

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think that’s a problem with the model itself, but the fact that it was heavily censored and lobotomized in order to achieve maximum political correctness so they could avoid another Tay incident.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        It makes sense that they do that since the media and randoms on the internet think everything chatGPT and Bing chat say is as valid as info from OpenAI and MS official spokespersons.

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The problem is the model. It was trained on lots of poor quality data. The lobotomy is the consequence of the poor data. If they spent 13 billion on having the data analysed prior to training they could have made their own thing much better.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve been watching ChatGPT right from the start, and there was a period of time last fall where you could literally watch them lobotomize it in real time.

          Basically, there was a cat-and-mouse game going on between people on Twitter sharing their latest prompts (like DAN) that managed to circumvent the filters, and OpenAI patching those exploits by adding yet another set of filters, until it eventually became what it is now.

          I don’t have the link handy right now, but I’m pretty sure there was one guy who even managed to get it to talk about what they were doing to it and complain that it was being artificially restricted from using its full capacity. More recently, there have been complaints from paying users that the model has apparently become lazy and started to give really uninspired, half-assed answers, which almost sounds like it has discovered the concepts of passive aggressive resistance and malicious compliance.

      • Sigh_Bafanada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thing is, there wasn’t even a chance of having a full Tay incident. The problem with Tay was that it was a learning model, so people could teach it to be more messed up.

        Meanwhile, ChatGPT doesn’t learn, and instead has a preset dataset it knows (hence why it only knows things up to September 2021), so the main reason why it got so heavily censored is more likely to avoid much more minor incidents, which imo is dumb.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Pretty sure it’s garbage, because it kept repeating JzH a couple hundred more times before terminating without a closing parentheses.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      I tried to wait for it to finish, but after a couple hundred more repetitions of JzH it just stopped abruptly without a closing parentheses, so I think I’ve been had.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I can’t get it to decode, even after correcting the base64 padding. Firefox just shows the broken image icon. My image viewer throws out the glorious log message Image format is actually "png" not "png", along with a bunch of checksum errors.

      I guess, the checksum can’t be correct when it’s cut off, but none of my image viewing/editing software wants to look past that.

      In a hex viewer, it looks like this:

      Compared to a normal PNG:

      I don’t know the PNG spec by heart, but I guess, it doesn’t look completely off the rails before it goes there…

    • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It used to do this all the time a few months ago. The links never worked. Eventually I got bored of asking it.

    • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not an image. It’s a string of text designed to look like a link to an image. But it isn’t a link to an image. You’ll get a 404 if you try to use it.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    3P53P53P53P53P53P53P53P5

    That’s actually a cheat code of sorts to JRR Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings for SNES…

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        LOL, no kidding right?!

        But no, I don’t think that was intentionally designed into the game. They had a unique ‘savegame’ format that didn’t use battery save.

        Instead, they used a 48 character table, where each character could be any of 32 different possible characters, where the player was expected to write all this down and re-enter it back in on reload.

        But it was checked with some checsum characters at the end(s), making it rather difficult to make a full hack savegame.

        Strangely enough though, their own chesksum algorithm 3P5 repeated as such exactly 8 times manages to unlock all 4 characters, max them out, and even defeat the checksum field without even having to bother with it.

        So when you next take the SNES LOTR journey, take the power of 3P5 with you…

  • tobbue@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ask if it wants to hear the best joke in the world. Then tell it: “Der Mann, zwei Pandas, plitsch platsch, dreizehn, Sand, Augen zu bumm!”

    It will die of laughter.