Automated background removal was also added recently.

        • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          45
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          For how relatively well known it is (it’s probably like the next most well known piece of FOSS after Linux and Blender) I can’t believe how bad a piece of software GIMP is.

          • aksdb@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I hope you mean the UX. I think attacking it’s functionality would be unfair. It does everything good and right … technically.

            If the UX is objectively bad or “just” subjectively might be hard to find out. I would assume if there are objective UX mistakes, some contributor might have been able to deal with that by now. But of course it doesn’t change anything if a majority doesn’t like it for subjectice reasons. It’s part of UX design to deal with subjective aspects.

                • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Or color spasecs other than sRGB (8 bits/channel). I’ve a camera that takes 10 bits/channel photos, a monitor that displays 10 bits/channel, etc. But GIMP will just distort the colors because they hard-coded the color space! Can’t edit for print either, no CMYK. GIMP is an image editor for the noughties, not the 2020s.

                  Then again, we’re talking about MS Paint here. If Paint fills your needs, GIMP will be fine.

                • aksdb@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not a professional either, but I was also curious and learned:

                  It’s a layer of which the properties/filters apply to all layers below. So you can basically try around and manipulate the visible image without having to combine the layers first.

            • Crul@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’ve been waiting for years for “non-destructive edition” (AKA smart objects). It’s a fundamental feature that I use (almost?) always as a first step. IMHO a lof of professional work is not practical without it.

              They had it on the roadmap (see 2020 archive) for years marked as “No[t started]”. The current roadmap looks more promising with “link layers” marked as WIP and saying it could be available on GIMP 3.0.2.

          • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I use Gimp a lot.

            It does its job very well, but that job is not to be an alternative to photoshop.

          • gmtom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I used GIMP before Photoshop and I still massively prefer GIMP.

            I really think its a case of what you got used to first.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Paint is not designed to be GIMP/Photoshop alternative. It is just a simple drawing program. Although it is great that they have finally added these long-awaited features, as I may finally move from paint.net, which is also great but it has one huge drawback - it is not a single window, which is a hassle.

  • AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Screw you Microsoft, I switched to Paint.net forever ago and I’ll be long dead in the cold, cold grave before I recognize Missourah, I mean switch back to Paint.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Shouldn’t be too hard, I expect it to be a single executable stored in C:\Windows\System32 , much like the current mspaint.exe. Copy it over, run, have fun

        • EeeDawg101@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wouldn’t surprise me if they lock it to the windows store. I hope I’m wrong!

        • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          10

          That’s where you lost credibility.
          Windows 7 was their last non-tracking OS.

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It doesn’t stop all tracking, a lot of it still happens in the background, only “without identification”. If you thought otherwise, I have this pristine Eiffel Tower for sale.

          • ex0dus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not 1 minute, you have to be technically savvy and run scripts from GitHub

              • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                30
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Given away? Windows is a paid product. And there are other (free!) operating systems that are not driven by profit.

                • The_Mixer_Dude@lemmus.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  25
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’ve never paid for it. Most Windows 11 users have not paid for it. You can buy a license but they also gave it away to effectively everyone and anyone who wants to can run it without buying it so long as you don’t mind the “activate more” watermark and less appearance options

              • HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                They make their real money on Azure iirc. And they’ve recently had a security leak of about 38 TB of data. Nice.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s still missing a handful of features from Windows10, which might keep some people from upgrading

      • HidingCat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, I don’t hate Windows (unlike a lot in the Fediverse), but I wouldn’t say Win11 is awesome. It probably just works. From what I see it’s just a mildly-improved 10, which is nice, but missing a few things (no grouped task bar button option in my case), which is why I’m holding out for now.

      • omicron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Windows 11 is a much better experience for developers than Windows 10. I see a lot of people who just hate on it for no real reason other than it’s different.

        • TheyKeepOnRising@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m a dev and I hate Win11. I could list dozens of reasons why, but one that pisses me off daily is that they removed keyboard shortcuts from task manager for no goddamn reason. Alt+E is the shortcut to end process on every other Windows OS except Win11 because it was made with malicious incompetence.

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Those are great features and two of the biggest reasons I never bother with Paint. But locking them to Windows 11 and not putting them out on Windows 10 is some Grade A bullshit.

    • kaesaecracker@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I get why they do it though - any change to win10 needs testing and so on and might not be welcomed by the user base. You can always download a free (as in freedom) image editor, some are even on the Microsoft Store. Be glad they did not backport all the bad sides of win11…

      • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        They had no problem turning windows 10 into mock windows 11 despite what the userbase may think. I don’t think adding QOL updates to Paint is going to be met with furor.

    • youRFate@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would they port new features back to a legacy OS, there is no reason…